Talk:Let Me Reintroduce Myself

Let Me Reintroduce Myself was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 2, 2023	Good article nominee	Not listed

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gwen Stefani Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Let Me Reintroduce Myself/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This will run over the course of two days --K. Peake 09:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
"and the song's producer," → "and the sole producer,"
"to a new studio album" would it be more appropriate to write this or "to an upcoming studio album"?
Where is the older artist part sourced properly?
"and Stefani's brother" → "and Gwen's brother" per MOS:SAMESURNAME
Remove on the track after the instrumentation since this is implied
"A departure from Stefani's" → "A departure from Gwen Stefani's" because she was not the last Stefani mentioned
The one lyric and artwork sentence is not notable for the lead
"and comparing it favorably to" → "and making favorable comparisons to"
These three paragraphs are too small on their own, so merge the lead into two paras
"An accompanying music video to the song was" → "An accompanying music video was" with the wikilink
Remove the introduction to Philip Andelman since this is not required in the lead
"at a music video shoot." → "at a video shoot." to avoid using the term music video twice
"of the song's digital release," → "of the digital release,"

Background and release

Stefani doubting if her fans would do the same does not seem to be the point she is making in the quote
The source does not say that it was a Zoom conference where they met virtually
Pipe The Voice to The Voice (American TV series)
Either pipe Me Too movement to MeToo Movement or stylize it as that instead
"and described it her "a way of saying I’m" → "and described it as "a way of saying I'm"
Img looks good!
Wikilink music video
"also drew a comparison to her "Hollaback Girl" look," → "also drew a comparison to "Hollaback Girl"," since you have already specified this is about the style
"It serves as her first non-festive single release" → "It served as Stefani's first non-festive single"
Remove comma after third studio album
"after the announcement of her engagement to" → "after her engagement to" because no announcement is mentioned by the source
Wikilink lyric video to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT
Remove usage of "the" before Universal Music Group since that's not how it is stylized

Composition and lyrics

Img looks good!
The country part is not sourced, even though duets themselves are
Where is the Latin part sourced?
Wikilink as The Orange County Register instead
"said it was a" → "said it is a"
"claimed that the song helped" → "assured it helped"
"of Stefani’s days" → "of Stefani's days"
"Stefani's brother, Eric Stefani, contributes" → "Gwen's brother Eric Stefani contributes" per MOS:SAMESURNAME
"the song is about Stefani's" → "the song is about Gwen Stefani's" per above
"Ross wanted to help" → "Golan wanted to help"
"additionally references her 2005 single "Hollaback Girl"" → "additionally references "Hollaback Girl"" since it has already been introduced
"in the lyric:" → "with the lines"

Critical reception

"and compared it to "her days" → "and compared it to Stefani's "days"
""Although it’s been a" → ""Although it's been a"
"Paper likened the song" → "The staff of Paper likened the song"
"at the right time."" → "at the right time"." per MOS:QUOTE
Italicise Vulture.com and wikilink to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT
"to be clunky but overall" → "to be clunky, but overall"

Chart performance

"In the US," → "In the United States,"
"at number 3." → "at number three." per MOS:NUM
"It later reached at peak" → "The song later reached at peak"
Remove the ranking of the UK Singles Chart since that is not notable here
"It debuted at" → "The song debuted at"
Mention a couple or so more European airplay or digital charts per the lead

Music video

Wikilink music video on the img text
"The accompanying music video for "Let Me Reintroduce Myself" was" → "The accompanying music video was"
"released on January 1, 2021 to Stefani's YouTube channel." → "released to Stefani's YouTube channel on January 1, 2021."
Pipe Today to Today (American TV program)
"The video for "Let Me Reintroduce Myself" begins with" → "The video begins with"
Remove the comma after solo music video
"The "Let Me Reintroduce Myself" video then transitions" → "The scene then transitions"
Remove the comma after debut studio solo album
Remove pipe on Zoom
"of the song itself" and called it" → "of the song itself", and called it"
Wikilink Entertainment Tonight

Live performances

"on December 7, 2020 for a" → "on December 7, 2020, for a"
Remove pipe on Today
"Her performance on The Tonight Show was also" → "The third performance was also"

Track listing

Good

Credits and personnel

Good

Charts

Pipe HRT to Croatian Radiotelevision

Release history

Good

References

Copyvio score looks pretty good at 36.7%!!
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 3
Wikilink Entertainment Weekly on ref 5 instead of ref 14
Orange County Register → The Orange County Register on ref 6 with the wikilink
Wikilink Apple Music on ref 13 for the first instance
Pipe UPI to United Press International on ref 15
Cite YouTube in the via parameter instead on ref 18
Wikilink Entertainment Tonight on ref 19
Add url-access limited to refs 22, 44 and 60
Pipe People to People (magazine) on ref 28
What exactly makes ref 31 a reliable source?
Cite Vulture.com as work/website instead on ref 32 with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT and add url-access limited plus fix the misspelling of comeback
Author-link Jon Pareles and Jon Caramanica on ref 33 and add url-access registration
Pipe MRC Data to Luminate Data on ref 39
WP:OVERLINK of Gwen Stefani on ref 45
Pipe Global Citizen to Global Citizen (organization) on ref 54
WP:OVERLINK of YouTube on ref 56
Cite HRT as publisher instead on ref 62 and pipe to Croatian Radiotelevision

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; I would have posted my initial comments yesterday, but I did not have the time. --K. Peake 11:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I will be getting to this shortly. Carbrera (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Carbrera Any updates on this? --K. Peake 21:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✗ Fail for this one due to the nominator's lack of activity. --K. Peake 07:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]