Talk:Let Love In (Goo Goo Dolls album)

Okay, this need sources, as well as more information on what the Goo Goo Dolls intend for this album and what will be on it. A single has been released- "Better Days".-RomeW 08:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted the page, since it was vandalised.

-How do these albums get leaked on to the web so easily?

Album Number

it depends if you count the best of album and the live album, if you do this is album 10, if they don't count then this is albub 8. Either way I don't care, but would like those who do to discuss it here instead of constantly reverting each other --T-rex 23:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would see no reason that those two woudn't count. —Akrabbim 19:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the goo goo dolls official page, it is their 8th studio album, the Live in Buffalo and EOAC cds don't count as studio albums apparently, maybe they should be put under an "other" category --Mouna 2 16:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It says Let Love In is the Goo Goo Dolls ...... album. And well, they've released 10 albums. However, EOAC is also a studio album, but I wouldn't call it a greatest hits album. And live in Buffalo contains a studio version of Give A Little Bit. Point being, I think it may be too wordy to go into detail that much, when this page is about the album Let Love In. I think briefing it is better. But if someone wants to include more detail, you might want to include that on the Goo Goo Dolls main page, rather than the Let Love In album page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.207.214 (talk • contribs)

I wouldn't say that EAOC is a studio album. It is only a remastered compilation. There was no new studio recording session. In my opinion, all that needs to be on this page is "8^th studio album." —Akrabbim^talk 00:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EOAC is a studio album, though I get your point. It's not a live album, but it certainly is a product produced in the studio, though it's not new. However, I don't see what the big deal is; if it means that much to you to say "eight studio albums" then change it. Though I don't believe it is technically correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.207.214 (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls - Let Love In.jpg

Image:Goo Goo Dolls - Let Love In.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ggdletlovein.png

Image:Ggdletlovein.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 17:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ggdletlovein.png

Image:Ggdletlovein.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]