Talk:Let's Move!

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Upcoming revision

For those people watching the page, User:Caleylynch4 will be doing a major revision of this article for her Classroom assignment in the next several months any feedback on the changes would be great! Sadads (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement

Background
1. In the "Childhood Obesity" section, more recent statistics and explanation from the CDC.
2. Related Government programs, including Task Force on Childhood Obesity
History of the program
Goals and objectives
1. Under, "Physical Activity" section, link to the "Let's Move" website.
Add a section to include the press the campaign has been given, along with Michelle Obama's recent press tour and maybe some quotes.
"Criticism" section needs expanding.
1. News
2. Politicians
3. Scholars

~~caleylynch4

The most glaring omission in the article presently is the lack of your #5: "Criticsm" or "Reception" section -- the program was mocked and/or resisted by some prominent politicians and pundits; Republicans were split over it; there is scholarly debate about how effective it was (or wasn't). For example: "Turns Out Michelle Obama’s Obesity Campaign Was a Flabby Flop" and "Conservatives Split Over Opposition to Michelle Obama's Obesity Drive". Tmusgrove (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

It appears Let's Move! Flash Workout is a part of the larger Let's Move! campaign and really doesn't have enough weight and notability on its own to warrant a separate article. The former is also quite short and would be easy to merge. Ljgua124 (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added more details in the outline on where I think there could be expansion/more discussion. That is still really rough and relies alot on what scholarship is available, but from a brief glance at what I have seen online it should be doable, 10:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I think that the photo used should be taken down and replaced with one that does not violate anyone's rights. The photo information even shows the following blurb under it: "Personality rights warning: This work contains material which may portray one or more identifiable persons alive or deceased recently. The use of images of living or recently deceased individuals is, in some jurisdictions, restricted by laws pertaining to personality rights, independent from their copyright status. Before using this content, please ensure that you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's personality rights. See our general disclaimer." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.121.97 (talk) 02:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - it would be better if included it one article. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 09:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Really interesting article! Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Communicationstudent4 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The section about Chefs Move to Schools is relevant and cited. Leave it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.241.250 (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

results?

any results, any campaigns implemented - or only PR? 93.220.122.66 (talk) 06:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Let's Move!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Simmons College supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy/Courses/Spring 2011/Public Relations Seminar (Marlene Fine) and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant criticism in the lead

The lead says the goal of the project was to combat *childhood* obesity in the US. Then it says that this goal was not attained. Then it cites statistics about *overall* obesity in the US. These statistics are not about the stated goal, so they don't tell us whether the goal was attained or not.

I don't know one way or the other whether the goal was actually attained; it quite possibly wasn't. I'm just saying the statistics cited should be the relevant ones. Aurodea108 (talk) 22:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this - I've just removed from this section a phrase referring to obesity rates among African-American women as I was concerned that as well as being irrelevant its inclusion was racially biased.

If updated CDC statistics are included in the 'Childhood Obesity' section as per the 'Suggestions for improvement' comment above then they could be summarised in the lead. Breatheforpeace (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed this while reading through, and I agree. Feels like WP:SYNTH to me, at least in its current form. I think this should be moved out of the lead, and into the impact section, with more relevant information. Saghetti (talk) 06:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]