Talk:Less-active Mormon

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 October 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Less-active Mormon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inactive versus less active

The term "less active" appears to be more widely used currently than "inactive" (the change is even mentioned here). You may want to incorporate this more modern term into the article. 72Dino (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. Do you think the article should be renamed, or will adding less active solve the problem? -- Adjwilley (talk) 18:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't believe this topic needs a standalone article. I think it would be more appropriate as a section of an existing article. 72Dino (talk) 23:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was to make it a short subsection in Mormons that would be 2-3 sentences long. In researching the topic, I was having a hard time finding stuff published, and the closest thing anywhere on Wikipedia was the article on Jack Mormons. I couldn't stand the thought of mentioning less-active Mormons on the Mormons page, and then linking to Jack Mormon for more information. That's why I created this page. There are no official figures, but based on the non-citeable estimates I've read so far, it looks like 60-80% of Mormons are less active or inactive. If that's the case, I think a separate article would be appropriate to discuss the topic in depth. When I do find citeable sources on the subject, I will fill out this article. -- Adjwilley (talk) 15:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On a different note, I think renaming the article to Less active Mormon is probably a good idea. -- Adjwilley (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to keep the article, then renaming it to the current term seems appropriate. 72Dino (talk) 15:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I will do that now. I'll make "Inactive" redirect. -- Adjwilley (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Learned that copying and pasting is not the proper way to move a page. Moved it correctly this time. -- Adjwilley (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Less-active Mormon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20150420215900/http://signaturebooks.com/2014/10/mormon-news-october-13-17/ to http://signaturebooks.com/2014/10/mormon-news-october-13-17/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]