Jump to content

Talk:Leslie Grinsell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Leslie Grinsell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 02:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 02:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Early life

[edit]
  • "...although their notes for this were destroyed during a Second World War air raid before...": suggest rewording to: "... although their notes for this were later destroyed in an air raid during the Second World War before..."
  • I suggest spinning the paragraph about Egypt into its own section, perhaps with a Second World War heading or Egypt heaing. The Early life section is looking quite long. Also, there is a typo here: "...visiting al of the..."
    • Personally I'm not convinced. There just isn't enough information to expand the Egypt information into its own section. It's only a short paragraph at present and the information doesn't really seem available with which to expand it. Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Life as a professional archaeologist

[edit]
  • In the heading, delete the years (suggestion only). And shouldn't headings be title case?
  • "Based on his experience during this period, in 1958 he published The Archaeology of Wessex." This sentence could be rephrased as the following sentence chronologically jumps back to 1952. I suggest: He later published the book The Archaeology of Wessex, which was based on his experience during this period.
  • Festschrift: not italicised (it is in the lead) and follow this with an English translation of the term in brackets. And who/what issued it?
    • I've italicised the word, although there is no English language translation of the term. Ashbee (who is being used as a source) doesn't give the publisher but I'll add the publisher and editors name regardless. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • Captions are appropriate as are the image tags.

Review summary

[edit]

With the issues noted above corrected, I believe that this article will meet the GA critera; it is well written with neutral tone, fully cited, organised and laidout appropriately with compliant images. Overall nice work, and an interesting subject. I enjoyed reviewing the article. Will check back in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]