Talk:Leser v. Garnett

U.S. Supreme Court cases High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

stub

This page is currently marked a stub, but it seems a full and complete treatment of the subject. (Indeed, it seems very good to me as, in this instance, an encyclopedia user.) Out the stub marker be removed? 71.77.12.236 03:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree—it's no longer a stub. I've removed the stub tag. By the way, if you see an obvious example like this in the future, go ahead and remove the stub tag—if someone disagrees with you removing it, they'll just add it back in. — Mateo SA (talk | contribs) 17:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]