Talk:Les Cabrils station
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 23:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Les Cabrils station is the least used passenger railway station in France, seeing only 14 passengers for the entire year in 2015? Source: https://www.topito.com/top-gares-moins-frequentees-france
- ALT1: ... that the least-used passenger station in France is named after goats?Source: Adrien Roques; Jules Charton (1875). "De Béziers à Bédarieux. - Nouvelle voie ferrée. - Le Bousquet-d'Orb". Le Tour du monde (in French). 29–30. Hachette. p. 146. Retrieved January 8, 2015.
Created by Oaktree b (talk). Self-nominated at 01:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC).
- Nice article Oaktree b. I made a few repairs to the article until I tried to link it to Wikidata when I discovered this similarly names article aka Des Cabrils Station which I think is Les Cabrils station. I think we need to merge these two. Do help/lead? with this and have another go at DYK (tip: look in Wikidata.com before starting an article as it records lots of synonyms etc for Wikipedia article). Victuallers (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b: Oh it looks like you created both of them. Give me a ping when you have sorted out whats what. Victuallers (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b: Please return to the nomination and respond to Victuallers' concerns. If you are unable to do so within 24 hours, the nomination will be closed as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I've moved the text from the one article to the other and blanked the page and have corrected the wikidata errors. Les Cabrils should be the only one left, hopefully this satisfies the nomination. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the edits. Victuallers Is this good to go now? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: ...That is much neater @Oaktree b: - with just one article now!. I was just going to tick it when I realised that reference 6 is a video blog and that is not considered a reliable source for important information. This supports a large paragraph and without it the article is going to have difficulty passing the 1500 characters of text required for DYK. A video blog to support "The open-air shelter was noted to have a timetable, onwards travel information and a help point/ emergency telephone." would work for me if these items are on the video but items about timetable details, covid, costs etc should be better sourced. Ping me if you think you've done it (or if it looks unsavable). Victuallers (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers:@Narutolovehinata5: Ok, I've added information from the most recent SNCF timetable available online for the station and have added links from a magazine article to work around the limitation from the travel blogger's report. I think this satisfies all concerns noted. Other than being, well pictured in the video, the SNCF doesn't officially list them as being "features". I'm iffy about the handicap support offered, I supposed you'd call over to the house and get the resident to assist you. It's officially offered, so I've left it in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: ...That is much neater @Oaktree b: - with just one article now!. I was just going to tick it when I realised that reference 6 is a video blog and that is not considered a reliable source for important information. This supports a large paragraph and without it the article is going to have difficulty passing the 1500 characters of text required for DYK. A video blog to support "The open-air shelter was noted to have a timetable, onwards travel information and a help point/ emergency telephone." would work for me if these items are on the video but items about timetable details, covid, costs etc should be better sourced. Ping me if you think you've done it (or if it looks unsavable). Victuallers (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the edits. Victuallers Is this good to go now? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I've moved the text from the one article to the other and blanked the page and have corrected the wikidata errors. Les Cabrils should be the only one left, hopefully this satisfies the nomination. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b: Please return to the nomination and respond to Victuallers' concerns. If you are unable to do so within 24 hours, the nomination will be closed as unsuccessful. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I removed the stuff from the blog and its still large enough so tick. I'll let the picker decide which hook they like. Thank you. Victuallers (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Per discussion from WT:DYK, I've pulled this hook. If there isn't an explanation for this one, the nomination should be failed. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 19:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging Oaktree b for their input. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- I assumed that based on the prior discussion, the nomination was closed as I had created two articles (in error) and this nomination was therefore outside the window of eligibility. Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)