Talk:Lepospondyli

	Lepospondyli is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Early tetrapod relationships worked out

Ruda et. al. (2003) found Lepospondyli to be the sister group to Amniota but also demonstrated that Westlothiana was the sister taxon to Lepospondyli. Given their cladistic analysis, is Amphibia really polyphyletic?

Ruta, M, MI Coates & DLJ Quicke (2003), Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biol. Rev. 78: 251-345. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The phologeny of basal amphibian/reptilimorphs changes every week. I think it's important to wait for some kind of consensus to form in the literature before making drastic changes to the classification. I'd say if two or three papers from the last few years agree, we can implement it. Dinoguy2 19:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reptiliamorpha

Why does the infobox say the clade is reptiliamorpha when the text says it's Batrachomorpha? Jonathan Tweet (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, this is probably wrong (Reptiliomorpha). Our ongoing studies (two of them, based on different types of data) still suggest, as in all my previous publications, that lepospondyls are amphibians (or Batrachomorpha, as mentioned in the text; closer to lissamphibians than to amniotes). One of them (Marjanovic & Laurin 2016) is available in preliminary (Preprint) version on the PeerJ web site. Of course, not all my colleagues accept my results, far from it, but it would be more careful and objective, pending a consensus, to consider them as Tetrapoda incertae sedis. Michel Laurin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lepospondyli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050420042136/http://www.permiantetrapods.net/LEPOSPONDYLI.html to http://www.permiantetrapods.net/LEPOSPONDYLI.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]