Talk:Lepavina Monastery

	This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for 46° 5′ 29.02″ N, 16° 40′ 39.48″ E —109.165.145.85 (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed — But not with absolute certainty. Coordinates from Panoramio photos are scattered all over the area, both north and south of Lepavina village, and the satellite view on the Monastery's website indicates a position out in the middle of a field closer, but not close, to the pre-existing coordinates than to the new ones. Examination of photos and comparison to the low-res satellite images shows that the building layout at the new coords is closer than at the pre-existing coords and, more importantly, that the terrain (visable through Acme Mapper) shown in the photos is much more similar at this location than at the pre-existing one. I'm 99.99% sure this location is correct (but 100% sure that the pre-existing one was wrong). If anyone can resolve the question for certain, a note here would be a comfort. — TransporterMan (TALK) 15:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]