Talk:Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heir Presumptive to Romanian Throne

It should be mentioned that 'Leopold' was heir presumptive to his yonger brother's throne. He renounced his rights in favour of his eldest son William (who in turn renounced in favour of his younger brother Ferdinand). -- GoodDay (talk) 23:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

documents of the renunciations, 1880 and 1886

printed versions of those documents, scanned, are currently (perhaps a few months) at this temporary wwebsite. There very clearly the renunciation of Leopold in 1880 mentioning his sons who received it; and the 1886 renunciation of Guillaume, mentioning no reservations nor any remainders to his eventual progeny. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 12:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That site is a message board, which we don't accept as reliable sources; see WP:RS, please. SamEV (talk) 03:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the printed book whose pages are there in that message board, is an earlier publication. People should be able to understand the difference between a discussion in a message board, and evidence from other sources pasted to a message board discussion. Your objection is not acceptable. As to wp:rs, people should assess the reliability of the scanned material, and not that they have been for now conveyed by means of a message board. And there has been no allegation that those printed texts would be false, since they surely appear as direct printings of the oroginal letters. I overrule your objection. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 01:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the publication was a printed booklet titled 'la succession au trone de Roumanie', printed in about 1890s (however any printing date not mentioned in the booklet) at the Carol Göbl publishing house, Bucharest. an extant copy of this publication was found at the Carol I University Central Library in Bucharest. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090428230257/http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/hohenzollern.html to http://www.angelfire.com/realm/gotha/gotha/hohenzollern.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]