Talk:Leoben Conoy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Battlestar Galactica

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the Battlestar Galactica task force.

Conoy -> Conroy

I'm changing as much of this as possible to reflect his actual name Leoben Conroy not Conoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.244.93 (talk • contribs)

Your wrong! Every reference to this character spells his name CONOY not CONROY! Cyberia23 06:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is Conoy Skinjob #1?

Just a quick thought...I was playing with anagrams...

Leoben Conoy could be turned around into Beo Cylon One. That might not mean much, but If you assume that there may be a mis-spelling of the first name: Lioben or Leobin, then that would become: Bio Cylon One. Anyone have an opinion? -- Mkamensek ^(talk) - The LeftOverChef

Episodes

I have not seen this model in some time, is there a reason for that? Tinman8443 06:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BSG Characters with angels

Gaius Baltar (apparition looks like Caprica Six)
Caprica Six (apparition looks like Gaius Baltar)
Kara Thrace (apparition looks like Leoben Conoy)

Ragnar, Adama, and Leoben

"This makes Adama suspicious as it is a reaction that Cylons have to radiation (in this case emitted by the gas giant the anchorage orbits)."

How would this fact make Adama suspicious? He has no reason to believe or even suspect that "skinjob" Cylons exist at this point. Also, how would he know that radiation makes Cylons sick? He only finds out that Leoben is a Cylon after Leoben tells him as much. Adama is naturally suspicious of Leoben, but after everything he's been through, who wouldn't be?

--70.77.37.70 19:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kara's Hallucinated Raider

In the section of this article on "Leoben's role in Starbuck's destiny," it mentions that Kara has hallucinations of non-existent Cylon raiders and that she hallucinates a dogfight with it. Is this accurate? While her ship showed no damage after the first encounter, the bullet from the second encounter seems to be what knocked her unconscious (and into the avatar Leoben's guidance). More importantly, in the second encounter you see the heavy raider for the first time out of Kara's perspective, when the camera is following Apollo's wing as he tries to convince Kara to pull out of the maelstrom. Has there been any official comment on this, or is the hallucinatory description merely speculative? --68.114.223.108 (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article header

Someone should change the title of this article to reflect Leoben's model number. As far as I can tell that is the standard for the other models' articles. Besides, we don't really know whether they all used the same name or if we only saw one (or a few) of them in the series. --KatjaKat (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]