Talk:Lendrick Muir School

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scotland

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hi

I've tried to tidy this up, but was dismayed to see my edits were changed back. I haven't changed the text much, but did make an effort to add headings and so on, as well as relevant internal and external links. Manwithapast (talk) 16:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The School did not accept pupils who were sexually promiscuous, psychotic, habitually delinquent or seriously behaviourally disturbed"

WHO THE HELL WROTE THAT THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ME OR BY THE SOUND OF IT ANY OF THE KIDS WHO WERE THERE IN MY TIME Rant over thanks for reading

David Cox FP 1978-1982 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.163.243 (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who wrote it originally, but I quoted it from the LMS pamphlet which is available here: http://lendrick-muir-school.co.uk/pdf/lms-leaflet.pdf

I can understand your frustration at the difference between rhetoric (the official line) and reality (what actually happened). Much of what LMS claimed was untrue, and many of the things that should have happened didn't; many things which ought not to have occurred did!

Wikipedia asks that entries are impartial, accurate and from reliable sources. It's difficult, therefore, to include personal experiences in any meaningful way.

I've reworded the section and hope you feel that this makes it more accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manwithapast (talk • contribs) 07:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]