Talk:Lemonade, Inc.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This entire article reads like a PR piece and links directly to the company's page. The stats listed are extremely misleading and not standard metrics for the industry. The company has not gain much market share yet and is struggling for viability with only about $500k in earned premium since inception which is a financial unfeasibly low number for this industry. Please include plain facts and not cherry picked marketing numbers from unofficial sources.

This article continues to be edited to be a biased marketing piece without links to impartial sources.

This is basically a marketing article for Lemonade - editors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:C801:A48C:7539:7207:E637:C3EC (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, and added the advertising tag. I looked at the article's edit history and it seems unfavorable information that is added about the company ends up being being reverted/challenged. Hopefully more experienced editors will investigate for a potential conflict of interest. The article's focus on social good and presentation of the company as revolutionary seems like flowery PR. It is an insurance company at the end of the day with a sleek mobile app, not a charity. 2601:782:400:9E4A:C44E:D5F7:9F9C:43D (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2601:782:400:9E4A:C44E:D5F7:9F9C:43D I made some edits to the article. Removed a ton of marketing content, rewording to give it the neutral point of view. Do you think we are ready to remove the advertising tag? אגם רפאלי (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]