Jump to content

Talk:Lemon of Troy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLemon of Troy has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLemon of Troy is part of the The Simpsons (season 6) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 3, 2008Good article nomineeListed
February 13, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Right, an article about "The Simpsons" with no pictures of the actual episode. Really, Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.210.179 (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1984 Reference

[edit]

One of the shelbyville kids asks bart what two plus two equals and bart replies five. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.33.149.202 (talk) 04:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Database is referencing Pat from SNL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boy I never thought of it before, but I bet you're right. He sure is Patesque. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.186.125 (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So good.

[edit]

Man this episode is dope. Zepheus 01:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I give up.

[edit]

Goofs:

All the kids leave Mrs. Krabappel's class when Nelson announces that the tree is missing, but only some show up at the spot where the lemon tree used to be.
How is this a goof?

Cultral references:

There are several possible nods to The A-Team, including Bart leading his men on a mission of...
OK listen folks, if you start a sentence with "There are several possible ..." then IT DOES NOT BELONG IN AN ENCYCLOPEDIA.

Quotes: Don't quotes belong in Wikiquote? What is the purpose of including all this "filler" crap here?

Ugh I give up. I came here and thought I'd try to contribute by cleaning up the errors, speculation, and downright poor writing in the Simpsons articles but there is just so much, I don't even know where to start —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.107.144 (talk) 06:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Pee Wee Reference

[edit]

I'm almost 100% sure that the fight Bart had with the Shelbyville boy (specifically, the 'I know you are, but what am I' argument) is a send up of the fight Pee Wee and Francis had in Pee-wee's Big Adventure (you can watch it on youtube here). Would that count as a cultural reference? Metathesiophobia 07:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stand by Me

[edit]

Isn't Nelson running in to frantically tell everyone something important a reference to Stand By Me? DudleyScardsdale 23:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Friday the 13th

[edit]

Anyone else think that when the dogs head gets smashed into the RV door leaving a dog head imprint is a reference to Friday the 13th Part 6: Jason Lives when that girls head is smashed into the RV door leaving her face imprint? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.39.83.228 (talk) 01:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lemon of Troy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Lead
  • I would suggest writing out RV in full first time it is used. I appreciate it's wikilinked but for a simple edit which wouldn't tempt people to click away from the page, I think it's a simple change to make.

It's only one minor point, so I will leave it up to you to change, and I will pass the article. Another good read and well-structured. Meets all the GA criteria. Well done.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Peanut4 (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks for reviewing! --TheLeftorium 13:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemon of Troy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lemon_of_Troy&oldid=1208142441"