Talk:Leland B. Yeager

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Leland B. Yeager is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unsupported categorization

I removed a category here [1] as MPS is not mentioned in the article. The removal was reverted here: [2]. I note that WP:CAT says "Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. [Emphasis added.]" With this editing guideline in mind, restoration of the category is improper. – S. Rich (talk) 03:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my edit summary. It's easy to find a source, if this bothers you. Please do so rather than delete. Personally, it doesn't bother me. It's widely known and not controversial and some editor will find the source if you choose not to. SPECIFICO talk 03:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit summary. The guidance cited above says verification is needed. And WP:V is one of WP core content policies. Also this is a BLP. Some other editor is more than welcome to provide sourcing since you choose not to do so even though it is "widely known" and "easy to find a source". – S. Rich (talk) 03:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]