Talk:Leigh McCloskey

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Star Trek Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflict of interest

Please note this article has been extensively edited in October 2011 and in May 2013 by the subject of the article, Leigh McCloskey. The additional content has been entirely unsourced and therefore unverifiable, so I've removed it. In addition, the section on art was largely unintelligible - it would need to be backed up by reliable sources to help readers understand its purpose. Sionk (talk) 00:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leigh McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113042516/http://warp.net/records/flying-lotus/player/video/inside-the-codex to http://warp.net/records/flying-lotus/player/video/inside-the-codex

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Hermit (1).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full Disclosure: Changes made to reflect subject's career as visual artist made by someone close to subject

In January 2020, changes were made to Leigh McCloskey's Wikipedia entry to reflect his career as a visual artist in addition to his acting career.

No content about his acting career was changed, however, a significant amount of content was added to represent him as an accomplished painter and author. All changes are cited with references to articles in local and national publications that describe McCloskey as a painter, and all content that represents him as such is written in a way that is clear, objective and nonbiased. Prior to this, his Wikipedia page reflected only that he was a television actor, which is inaccurate as he is also an accomplished painter and author.

I am the user who made these changes, and I write this with full disclosure that I am close to the subject. While it is I cannot deny that I was motivated in part as a personal favor to Mr. McCloskey, my main motivation in making these changes is so that Wikipedia can most accurately represent the facts about its subjects. Mr. McCloskey is semi-retired from acting (his IMDB doesn't list an acting credit since 2014) and has focused the majority of his talents and energies into his painting career, which has been recognized in both local and national publications (KCET, Vice, etc.). In addition to this, his work has been featured in popular musical acts' album art and live stage design. It would be wholly inaccurate and incomplete for his Wikipedia to reflect only his acting career and neglect his accomplishments as a visual artist. As state above, all changes were written in a clear, objective and nonbiased matter with utmost attention to Wikipedia's guidelines. I do not wish to promote and/or provide public relations for Mr. McCloskey, only to ensure that Wikipedia provides complete and accurate information about its subjects.

Thank you.

Thoths.Offer (talk) 23:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you understand how Wikipedia works. Edits appear to be properly supported by sources and well written and you disclosed your possible conflict of interest.

It's the poorly written press releases full of hyperbole and puffery that are a problem, I doubt anyone will have any reason to take issue with your edits. -- 109.79.161.25 (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]