Talk:Legio III Italica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legio III Italica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italica recruits from Italy ?

The first soldiers could also have come from Spain. "Italica" is the name of an important Roman settlement near todays Seville in Spain. Seville is in the marshes of the Guadalquivir river, where there are lots of storks (the legion`s symbol). So first recruits being from Italy should be checked.

My only source, livius.org says Italy, not Spain. Furthermore, this legion was raised togeterh to the II Italica, and it seems unlikely that a single city would provide 2 legions at the same time. However, if you have any proof in favour of Spain, tell us.--Panairjdde 09:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Language of the article

I am a novice editor, so I don't wish to cause offence, but the English of this article reads rather as if it has been translated from another language by a non-native speaker. Would it be desirable to attempt to improve flow and meaning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fergus Wilde (talk • contribs) 10:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legio III Italica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061110145214/http://www.legioiiiitalica.org/ to http://www.legioiiiitalica.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "Vexillation" throughout the article - change to "detachment"?

Throughout the History section, the article refers to "vexillations" (also "vexillationes" and "a vexillation"). I have provided a translation "sub-unit" after the first mention, and an earlier editor has kindly done the same in the later section.

However, the History section is long (and potentially confusing for non-specialists), and the reader can easily forget this translation and constantly have to refer back to the top. I propose instead to invert the first mention in history so that it reads "attest to detachments (vexillationes)..." and then change each subsequent reference to "vexillations" or "a vexillation" to "detachments" or "a detachment" respectively. This would also involve editing the previous editor's work to change their translation of vexillationes to be "detachments" rather than "sub-units". In this, I am seeking consistency with the existing page on vexillationes, which describes them in the first line as "a detachment of a Roman legion"

I recognise that the Latin vexillatio- terms are the original and more technically accurate, but believe the continual references to an unusual word damage the readability and comprehensibility of the article, while adding nothing in terms of accuracy compared to the term detachment(s).

Comments are welcome, though I note this Talk page has not been used in several years, so I will make my changes on 5th June 2022 if there are no criticisms, then this topic can be used by anyone in the future who would want to revert or take a different approach

--Eborus13 (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]