Talk:Legality of child pornography/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about Legality of child pornography. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Alegal
In Argentina, fictional child pornography is really alegal, you can still draw it. 2800:2145:B400:79:8D54:7F35:380C:99B6 (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Debate neutrality
I'm tagging the debate section as it does not seem to represent the debate but rather further advance the arguments for laws against child pornography. For example every argument for its legality contains a counter argument against it right after it but not the opposite. Further there's no mention of prohibiting virtual child pornography and that it has been debated even by academics in legislatures as being nonsensical. There is no mention of research that possession and usage does not lead to an increase in sexual abuse or that the research pointing to such is either not very substantial and lacking or in some cases non-existent. Laws that allow adolescents to engage in sexual activities but not in pornography and hence also cause issues with sexting have also increasingly been under fire. Biofase flame| stalk 11:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Edit request
I noticed that the UK Fictional cell says 'Illegal' but the summary says 'pseudo-photograph', which is defined in the law as 'appears to be a photograph'. I think 'Legal; not realistic' would be more accurate here. 2A02:AB88:248D:1C00:A310:3F9C:4C73:E41B (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024
This edit request to Legality of child pornography has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove flags from "Europe" and "North America" that fails MOS:ICONDECORATION. 83.171.90.83 (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{Edit semi-protected}}
template.
Also note that MOS:ICONDECORATION does allow icons for navigation, and this is common practice on similar pages (Legality of incest, Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory, Legality of cannabis( Jamedeus (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)