Talk:Legalise Cannabis Australia

	Australia portal Legalise Cannabis Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cannabis Mid‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Party website

I'm not sure which is the most relevant and the most official website to go with for the infobox. Here are the three I've found:

legalisecannabis.org.au
hemp.org.au
australianhempparty.com (Update - older page, no longer being considered)

Number two and three appear similar but have subtle differences and are not the same. Please give your reasoning for which you think we should use below. Thank you. Helper201 (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update, upon more closely reading australianhempparty.com/, this is the older page, which then moved to hemp.org.au. We can either keep both of these two pages (number 1 and 2, which may be my preferred option), or decide between them. Again, please leave your thoughts and reasoning below. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I found this website as well - legalise.org.au, not sure why it seems to exist as a homepage when it’s very similar to the first link I posted in my original post. Another we should consider. Helper201 (talk) 03:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion to move vote on vaccine mandates to individual members articles

its pretty standard for positions of individual members to be on their wiki page and not the parties page, it's not significantly relevant to the article and if all individual members various positions on different issues are included on the party page it risks becoming cluttered and reducing the quality of the article Politically Minded Stoner (talk) 06:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Politically Minded Stoner, I agree. It’s not something that I have found any evidence to support that the party holds any positions whatsoever on vaccines or vaccine mandates. Its policies and positions simply seem to be only those related cannabis and other related matters. Its candidates and politicians I think can generally hold their own views on other non cannabis related matters such as this. This is simply them exercising their own personal/individual views on a matter unrelated to cannabis or the party. Helper201 (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the party's only two MPs voted in favour of a position makes it a party stance not an individual stance. GeebaKhap (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how so?, all that shows is that is the stance of their only currently elected MPs, the LCWA party constitution states that Adoption of policies will be by ordinary vote of Members at a General Meeting, LCA and LCWA have no policy on vaccines or vaccine mandates, the party has no stance on vaccine mandates, thus its elected members can vote however they want Politically Minded Stoner (talk) 01:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]