Talk:Legal hold
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
HELP THIS PAGE
[edit]Can someone knowledgable on this topic also add information about "Document Retention Notices" and/or "Document Retention Orders". Are they the methods used to issue "Legal Holds" ? Commenter (talk) 21:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I will do my best to update this in the coming months. Anyone interested in helping can e-mail me directly at jjablonski@goldbergsegalla.com I am a subject matter expert and have a book on Legal Holds being published by ARMA International. Legal-Holds (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
In my review of this article, and most of the source material to which it is linked, I am unable to locate any actual law requiring an organization to institute a "legal hold" (absent the application of conventional discovery requirements imposed under applicable court rules; see for example the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure referenced in the article). Thus, the idea that an edict from some corporate counsel invoking a "legal hold" has the force of law appears to have been created out of thin air. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
HELP THIS PAGE
[edit]The article is not jargon; the topic is a critical issue for all of corporate america and the term "legal hold" is extremely well known in the legal community. There seems to be some original research; however being a named expert on the subject-it certainly should not be deleted.
Help This Page
[edit]I am debating listing this article on AfD because it is jargon and appears to be original research. However, it is a topic that probably is encyclopedic, if written the right way. Anyone want to help on this? Fundamentaldan 19:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
This page does need help
[edit]Seems like it was written by someone who just heard about this topic and wanted to put a page together. I'd be happy to edit with more info. It's not just jargon and original research. There is plenty of substance that should be discussed here, and I'd be happy to add and or edit, but I'm new at this and have to figure out how to edit the thing.Maynelaw 05:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Help This Page
[edit]I'd also like to see some information about how legal holds are issued and tracked, and how document retention and destruction policies tie into lit holds. Uxorious2 (talk) 21:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legal hold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021110256/http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/rules/EDiscovery_w_Notes.pdf to http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/rules/EDiscovery_w_Notes.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legal hold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://advisor.com/doc/18524 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100827212753/http://ediscoverytrends.com/2010/04/electronic-discovery-and-legal-holds/ to http://ediscoverytrends.com/2010/04/electronic-discovery-and-legal-holds/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Stubifying
[edit]I am stubifying this article. A majority of the "sources"/external links are spam and, for the most part, dead, and the article is better as a stub than it is in its current form. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)