Talk:Legacy House
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Allenl5566. Peer reviewers: Lbelfor, LaurenMichelleBrown.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Article Feedback
[edit]@Allenl5566: Good start on the article. A few quick suggestions:
- It seems that the references likely establish notability but it would help if you can provided links to the articles in your references? I would like to check these out!
- I think there are some issues with tone. I know you are excited about Legacy House but reading this seems to me more like this is more of an description of pamphlet about the organization than an encyclopedia articles. Some of the details might not be appropriate for an encyclopedia article and the way you write it should should closely follow WP:NPOV. Why don't you try to revise the article so that it's more of an "objective" description of facts. If somebody had never heard of Legacy House, what would they want to know?
Thanks for working hard on this! That's it for now! —mako๛ 19:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi professor! I just made some change about my article with a more objective point of view towards Legacy House and adds external links as well. Can you give me more feedback about the article, or I am good for now? Thank you- Allenl5566 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allenl5566 (talk • contribs)
- I think it's getting better but there's definitely still room for improvement. For example, although the article is, indeed, less breathless, I'm not sure it does as much as it should to articulate why the organization is notable (i.e., important, especially in terms of Wikipedia's guidelines). Doing these both at the same time is difficult but I think if you keep working on it, this will be in good shape! —mako๛ 01:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Hi Allenl5566, the subject of this article looks like a nice social service organization. However, I agree with Mako that more third-party references are necessary to establish that this organization meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. I'll refer you to the General notability guideline and suggest that you might look for references in news organizations other than newspapers. For example, it's ok to link to archived television reports. In general, I think that most retirement homes are unlikely to meet Wikipedia's notability standards, so you have a bit of an uphill climb to establish the notability of this organization. Good luck, --Pine✉ 03:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Got it ! Thank you so much! -Allenl5566 (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Allenl5566: I would focus on adding all of the references on this page and then maybe asking a reference librarian at UW for help searching for additional coverage to help improve it even more. Pine is right but that articles on retirement homes are unusual but you've convinced me that Legacy House is special. Your goal now is to convince others including those who might be skeptical.
- You need to establish this by explaining why LH is special in your article by spelling it out for viewers. You should also use references to establish notability according to the general notability guideline. I think you can do this. That one page on the organizations websites lists three articles in the Seattle Times, one in the Seattle PI, and one in KUOW. It seems that there is more as well. Good luck! —mako๛ 16:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)