Talk:Left Behind (Lost)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Left Behind (Lost) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage / Lost Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Lost task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Define "Main Character"

We're debating the definition of a main character on Lost over at Talk:Nikki Fernandez. If you care, please go take a look. 63.215.29.15 20:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another "Filler" Episode

Lotta backstory on Kate and why she and her mom are at odds, but little else of value. I think most people knew that "the fence" was to stop the Monster. I think most knew that Jack was hurt when he saw Kate and Sawyer together (so her discussing it with Kate was just continueing the "triangle" angle between The Three). And one more "see how they're all connected" with Sawyer's Cassidy running into Kate approaches the mundane. (What's next? Jack's mother had an affair with the guy that Sawyer killed in Australia thinking he was the real "Sawyer"?)

Aside from some "girl fighting" and falling in mud (always a crowd pleaser), the episode was worthless and could have been edited into the beginning of next week's.

As for next week's, it SEEMS (from the previews) that Juliet will be forced by Sayid to cough up SOME answers (obviously from her back-story she doesn't know "everything")....so we'll see.

Sonic Barrier Code

There is talk on a few fan sites that the code is 151623 not 1623 as you can see a mud print on the 5.--Baker1000 14:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot order

Someone put the plot segments in the right order please!

Fair use rationale for Image:3x15screengrab.jpg

Image:3x15screengrab.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Smokyvspylons.jpg

Image:Smokyvspylons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Left-behind.jpg

Image:Left-behind.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What did Sawyer do wrong in the Exposé episode?

Why did Hurley say that the people on the beach were going to hold a vote to banish Sawyer? I understand there was never going to be a vote and that Hurley was doing it to make Sawyer act nice. Also, I understand Hurley mentions it was something to do with Nikki and Paulo and the diamonds, but I'm not quite sure I caught what Sawyer did that he would fear being banished from the beach. Was it because he put the diamonds in the grave with Nikki and Paulo? Though there was no indication anyone was unhappy about that. If someone can help me with this, it may be helpful to put an explanation about this in the article for this episode. - Terry 5-7-08 12:39PM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.148.12.220 (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Left Behind (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Left Behind (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070322170817/http://www.abcmedianet.com/DNR/2007/pdf/DNR031907.pdf to http://www.abcmedianet.com/DNR/2007/pdf/DNR031907.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]