Talk:Lee Vandervis

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Libertarianism Start‑class Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Lee Vandervis is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Francis, Oscar (29 April 2022). "Councillor edits own Wikipedia page to 'repair misinformation'". Otago Daily Times.
Hendry-Tennent, Ireland; Swift, Molly (29 April 2022). "Dunedin City Councillor Lee Vandervis caught editing own Wikipedia page claims he was fixing misinformation". Newshub.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Leevandervis (talk · contribs)
Dudleybenson (talk · contribs)

Possible sources for expansion

No stadium in Christchurch
Opinion piece by Vandervis in The Press
Mayor Bob Parker's response
Editor's response to the opinion piece
Another opinion piece (demonstrates that he is a rather controversial character)
Ardent opponent of the Dunedin stadium, and he regularly gets quoted for it
Another stadium article

If the article is to survive the AfD, then the above should be worked into it. Schwede 66 20:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stripping out irrelevant facts and stating facts more neutrally

Kia ora.

There seems to be a risk of an edit war occurring here. Not my intention at all. The edits I did were not simply to take out the stuff that seems overly complimentary (and hardly appropriate for an encyclopedia), but also to condense the article into a more succinct one. The length and detail previously was not commensurate to this politician's public importance (or lack thereof). He likes some science fiction book? I hardly think that is sufficiently noteworthy or relevant to attract comment in this article. The edits I did were designed to improve the article, not vandalize it. If the edits were too strong, I will of course accept the reinstatement of the content, but I nevertheless think work needs to be done in streamlining the article. Happy to help with that if that is the consensus. Do not appreciate accusations of vandalism for a bone fide edit. Nga mihi Cbe46 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit by Lee Vandervis

Hi Lee - I noticed your editing of the article - if you are Lee Vandervis you need to declare a conflict of interest in accodance with Wiki guidlines Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Requests for updates to an article about yourself or someone with whom you have a personal connection can be made on the article's talk page by following the instructions at WP:COIREQ.

An exception to editing an article about yourself or someone you know is made if the article contains defamation or a serious error that needs to be corrected quickly. If you do make such an edit, please follow it up with an email to WP:VRT, Wikipedia's volunteer response team, or ask for help on WP:BLPN, our noticeboard for articles about living persons, or the talk page of the article in question.

Hopefully this is helpful for you. In the interim your edits are being reversed. NealeWellington (talk) 10:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for User:Dudley Benson - please read the above explanation about potential conflicts of interest. If you need assistance please follow the guidelines above. A point to note - You Tube is not considered a reliable source and, as used, it is probably a primary source so may not qualify on both grounds. I would suspect you may find something in the ODT that would cover the point raised. NealeWellington (talk) 04:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that an Otago Daily Times and Newshub articles claim that Lee Vandervis was caught editing his own Wiki page. As the reverter of the edits all that can be stated is that someone who called themself Lee Vabdervis edited the page. Neither I nor any editor can claim to know who that person was. I have removed the paragraph quoting the newspaper article as the article is based on assumption and not proof.NealeWellington (talk) 08:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But he admitted it? --Pokelova (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where? - I might have missed it. NealeWellington (talk) 08:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From the ODT article: "Mr Vandervis initially declined to address the editing directly, saying he was "in a position of trying to repair a whole lot of misinformation" which he had only recently been made aware was on Wikipedia. He later forwarded an email he sent to Wikipedia, saying that he was openly trying to correct erroneous claims about himself on the site and he believed he was in-line with its editorial policy. Unlike many users of the site, he did not use a pseudonym, Mr Vandervis said." --Pokelova (talk) 08:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He has also admitted to editing his own Wikipedia page on his Facebook page. The edit was factual and should be reinstated surely? I luv lee (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and re-added it, but while you're here @I luv lee: what is your connection to Lee Vandervis? --Pokelova (talk) 03:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@pokelova I have absolutely zero connection to the councillor, do not know him personally or professionally either and was merely trying to correct a mistake. I tried about 15 different user names and they were either taken or too close to another’s so jokingly tried that one and of course that turned out to be available. Go figure! I luv lee (talk) 04:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take your word. --Pokelova (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pokelova for sorting this out NealeWellington (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]