Jump to content

Talk:Lee Smith (baseball)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

WP:COTW votes

Lee Smith (baseball) (6 votes, stays until August 16)

Nominated July 26, 2006; needs at least 9 votes by August 16, 2006
Support
  1. Jaranda wat's sup 21:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  2. Em-jay-es 02:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  3. PDXblazers 03:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  4. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  5. --M@rēino 13:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  6. --Nishkid64 19:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Some sources to incorporate

I'm dumping some links that look like they'll be useful to the article:

--M@rēino 18:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I've used one so far (a more official-looking version of the 1st one). I also welcome anyone who can find a source for "saved nine games in the Orioles' first 16 games, the fastest to nine saves in major league history". I found it at April 23 in baseball#1990s but there's no source listed there. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

A few more:

—Wknight94 (talk) 16:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Great job guys!

It has been almost one week since Lee Smith (baseball) became the COTW and here are the results: [2]

I thank everyone who has contributed to the article, and I hope we can further improve it to Featured Article status.

--Nishkid64 20:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Image

Well, it's gonna be extremely hard for this to pass out of GAR without any images. Could this be a case whee a free use image would be alright? (Not in the box of course, but somewhere I'm sure you could argue successful fair use). --Wizardman 03:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Response left on your talk page. Nishkid64 02:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

GA?

Here's what I've noticed while reviewing it as a possible GA: -Okay lead, but I think it could be improved. -No references in the Boston section. -Many paragraphs start out with a year. Maybe change "1985" to "The 1985 season" to make it look better. Reading it so far it doesn't look too bad, at the same time I don't know if I would pass it. --Wizardman 04:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Oops, I totally forgot about fixing the lead. I'll also get to work on the other parts of the article. Nishkid64 02:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
There is alot of weasel words thoughout the article like 1986 World Series in shocking fashion started 1994 in fantastic fashion, etc that should fixed. Jaranda wat's sup 20:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, those are probably my fault. Actually, I'd like the 1986 one to stay - the Buckner play is the most shocking moment I've ever seen in sports. I literally jumped out my chair involuntarily when that ball trickled into right field. (And yes, I watched it live so I'm dating myself...) One of those "I remember where I was when..." moments. But I'll defer to everyone else since I probably added that. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Alright, it's up to GA standards now I'd say. I'd like at least one reference in each paragraph, and an image (which I understand is near-impossible to get, that's why I ignored that GA guideline). Those two are something to shoot for if you decide to go for FA-Class status. --Wizardman 01:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The Current Baseball card fails WP:Fair Use policies, which explicitly states, An image of a Barry Bonds baseball card, to illustrate the article on Barry Bonds. A sports card image is a legitimate fair use if it is used only to illustrate an article (or article section) on the card itself; see the Billy Ripken article. Given Smith is retired, any image of playing is an unrepeatable event, as long it is used to describe his playing career. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  20:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the image from the article. A previous image of the same baseball card was also removed and deleted, but for a different reason (copyvio). Nishkid64 (talk) 19:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look

Per a request on my user talk page, I thought i'd stop in and take a look at this. Not sure i'll make any changes major right away (assuming they are needed). // Tecmobowl 01:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I think that most of the content in the article is good. Some of the grammar could be improved upon, but that is not a major concern. I would say the one thing i would suggest is a restructuring of the content. I'm very fond of the way the Hank Aaron article and the general structure of the Sandy Koufax article. I think it would be beneficial if the article is structured more like those sections. I don't think the HOF section belongs. It seems based on speculation and conjecture and not on "facts". I would also think that the information in the highlights section should be incorporated into the article. Information like At-Bat by Steve Garvey is repeated unnecessarily. I think this is a great start, but it is far from what i would want in a featured article. // Tecmobowl 19:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Proposed pagemove

Shouldn't this page be located at Lee Smith (baseball player) instead of Lee Smith (baseball)? The article was originally created at the former title, but was moved on April 10, 2006. However, shouldn't the article title reflect that fact that he's a baseball player and not imply that he's a baseball? :P – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Page moved. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 09:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, according to our (extremely) informal guidelines, we tend to use just (baseball). The reasoning is that so many baseball players go on to become baseball coaches and baseball commentators and various other baseball-related occupations. I don't think we're very consistent about adhering to that but we probably should be. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)#Qualifier between bracketing parentheses seems to be the relevant section for this issue. Although it gives no specific guidance regarding athletes, all of the examples given (except two used to distinguish between people of different generations) use an occupation as the parenthetical disambiguator, rather than an activity or object. That is, (chemist) instead of (chemistry), (artist) instead of (art), and (cyclist) instead of (cycling). If a person's occupation changes over time, I suppose the disambiguator should reflect the occupation/profession that most contributes to their notability. – Black Falcon (Talk) 16:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The word "occupation" does not appear anywhere on that page. Looking at other sports, it's difficult to determine the standard. Ice hockey appears to use "(ice hockey)"random example, NFL is splitrandom example (I see the particularly ugly Sam Baker (American football player) where the disambiguation is longer than the player's name!), NBA uses "(basketball)"random example. I think the multiple occupations issue applies even more to baseball because many many players stay in the game in some capacity afterwards. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The word 'occupation' does not appear on the page, but "the examples given ... use an occupation as the parenthetical disambiguator" (chemist, actor, musician, congressman, and so on). Thus, what little guidance the page does provide hints at disambiguation by profession.
After looking at the examples that you provided (and some others), it seems apparent that there is no clear standard for pre-disambiguating articles on athletes. Ice hockey players (e.g. here) are disamiguated as (ice hockey), (ice hockey player), and (hockey player). NFL is also mixed, as you note. Association footballers (e.g. here) are consistently disambiguated via (footballer). Basketball players (e.g. here) are disambiguated mostly via (basketball) and only rarely as (basketball player). Perhaps centralised discussion on the subject is needed.
While the presence of a disambiguator that is longer than the name may be undesirable (as in the case of Sam Baker (American football player)), I think a grammatically misleading disambiguator is even more undesirable. Using (baseball) as a parenthetical disambiguator implies that the subject of the article is: (1) an actual baseball, or (2) a baseball-related topic. This is clearly a case of the latter, but it seems awkward to describe a person as a topic. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I guess I disagree with your base claim. A "(baseball)" disambiguator does not imply that the person is a baseball - it just implies that "baseball" is sufficient to distinguish him from other Lee Smiths. Other non-sports examples can be found such as this random category. Surely no one is going to think that John Blanchard is Pennsylvania. We have to allow for some application of common sense. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I should point out that you're focusing only the first possibility. However, as I said above, this is clearly a case of the latter – that is, the disambiguator implies that Lee Smith is a baseball-related topic. Thus, the issue is not the possibility for confusion, but rather the accuracy and awkwardness of disambiguation (describing a person as a topic). As for John Blanchard, I have moved the article to John Blanchard (politician) as the only other John Blanchard we have an article about is a preacher and author. – Black Falcon (Talk) 19:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyedit

I'm belatedly adding my signature as LoCE proofreader. I did the proofreading 12 hours or so ago, but the copyediting was done much earlier by another editor. Finetooth (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thank you! Nishkid64 (talk) 08:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Playoff teams

Just a note - one thing which I think would be interesting to note for most closers is whether they were on the mound when their team won a championship, clinched a pennant or division, etc. Unfortunately, this apparently doesn't apply to Smith; his only two playoff teams were the 1984 Cubs (clinched the NL East with a complete game win by Rick Sutcliffe) and the 1988 Red Sox (clinched the AL East on a day that they lost), and both lost in the playoffs. He didn't pitch too well in the postseason; his biggest save may have been in Game 2 in 1984, putting the Cubs one win away from the Series, but he gave up Steve Garvey's game-winning HR in Game 4 which tied it at two games each. He also lost Game 2 of the 1988 ALCS. MisfitToys (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hall of Fame voting?

It says he's received just over half of the 75% of votes needed - does that mean 38% or so? or 50%? It's kind of weirdly written --AW (talk) 22:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

In 2007 it was 39.8% See article. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks --AW (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Native of where?

"Natal", "native", "nativity" etc properly refer to birth. At one point the article says he is a native of Castor; at another point it says he was raised in Castor but born in Shreveport; and some of the stat sites list his birthplace as Jamestown. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 02:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Changed to "native of Shreveport". I will make a note of the discrepancy between Jamestown and Shreveport, though. Some sites say Jamestown and some say Shreveport. The locations are miles apart, though. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Lee Smith is not a native of Shreveport. He is in fact a native of Castor, Louisiana. He was raised there, still lives there and his kids went to school there. Maybe it isn't a reliable source but the classmate website says he graduated from CHS in 1975.

Mythical (talk) 05:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Native typically refers to place of birth, and sometimes the place where the subject spent most of his life in. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 02:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lee Smith (baseball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lee_Smith_(baseball)/Archive_1&oldid=1143891125"