Talk:Lee Mroszak

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Cabbie333 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (User is the article's subject; identity verified by OTRS (see userpage))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Mroszak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120123145612/http://about.me/LesCrucial to http://www.about.me/LesCrucial

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stern film

The cite ref for the Stern office sex film mentions this in passing but has almost no details. Only the fact hat there was such a film directed by Mroszak with Jeremy acting in it are confirmed. No date of filming,no mention of lack of permission from Stern, no co-star, no direct quotes, no 2006 confrontation, no comments by Mroszak, Stern, Fred or Jeremy. Meters (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have found some publication links for Wikipedia.

https://avn.com/business/articles/video/crazy-cabbie-digs-up-audio-of-stern-oking-studio-porn-51299.html Cabbie333 (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Metric.

Like I said before I only want the truth. In the article as for many years Howard Stern has claimed that he never said that I asked him to for permission to film a porno in his studio But as you can see from this publication he did and I provided the proof.

Powerful people have tried to make me out as a liar and ruined my life. I've never lied. And I now am finding all of the publications that provide the facts.

That's all I want.

https://www.xbiz.com/news/105585/crazy-cabbie-fielding-offers-for-porn-movie-shot-in-howard-sterns-studio

I'm not trying to sell it I just want to add to the Wikipedia article that Howard Stern gave me permission.

Please help me.

I hope you can. Lee Cabbie333 (talk) 04:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found something that has good published sources and the correct information for my earlier radio career in Minneapolis.

I believe at one point it was in the Wikipedia article and might have been removed by someone. One of the sources is from a novel that was written about the NFL football team the Green Bay Packers. I was included in the novel because of the radio bit that I did. Here is a link to the Google book page. https://books.google.com/books/about/Cold_Wars.html?id=4sHMom3TN10C

Here is a link to the online site that that has more accurate information about me that I believe the Wikipedia article about Lee Mroszak once had. I think someone deleted some of this stuff from the article that was actually more correct. I've still not figured out how to add sources. Or categories. This one has the cats pretty dead on.

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Lee_Mroszak

Thank you again for anything you can do to help me.

Cabbie333 (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to a NY times story published article that makes mention of the filming in the Stern Studio in Ron Jeremys' book.

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/books/review/Stern.t.html

Cabbie333 (talk) 15:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your talk page replies. Use one colon per indent level

My user name is "Meters", not "Metric". You have made this mistake multiple times. Please stop. user:Metric is a completely different user.

Please stop editing the article yourself. You have a conflict of interest and should not make any edits yourself. You have already been told this.

Propose your edits on this talk page. You have already been told this.You were pointed to the link that explains how to do so, and when you complained that it was too hard to understand I gave you explicit instructions on how to use the request an edit template. You are still not using it. Use the template and follow the instructions. It's not up to us to rewrite the article for you. Give us your proposed change on this page in a "Change 'X' to 'Y' " format (including the sources) and other editors will decide if we should make the change as proposed, if the change should be modified or partially implemented, or if the change should not be made. Break it down into small chunks that can be easily dealt with. Meters (talk) 22:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andy savage show?

any sources for cabbie's appearance on this show/info on what, exactly, that show was? JointCompound (talk) 07:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

claims of death

We've had unsourced edits claiming he died on Mar 30, 2024, and on Mar 31, 2024. When I first checked I could find nothing to support the death claim. There is now one site reporting his death (but with no actual death date) but it does not appear to be a reliable source. Please do not add his death without a reliable source. Meters (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And now we have claim that he died on April 1... Meters (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now sourced to March 30. Meters (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters I just revisited the article after I updated the article to accurately report his 3/30 death only to see that you reverted my edits to falsely report that he was still alive. If you believe a citation is needed on an article, please assume good faith and use the citation tag instead of reverting accurate information. Thank you. MiamiManny (talk) 12:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MiamiManny: No-one said anything about your edit having been made in bad faith. You added an unsourced claim that he had died on March 30. It is a WP:BLP violation to add unsourced contentious information such as that, and per WP:BLPREMOVE it must be removed, not tagged as needing a source. That's Wikipedia policy. It's up to the editor making the claim to provide a reliable source. The claim had previously been removed multiple times, as were similarly unsourced or unreliably sourced claims that he had died on March 31, and on April 1. This was explained in multiple edit summaries. And why are you bringing this up now? The sourced information has been in the article for three weeks now, as this talk page thread shows. Meters (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters So, you are citing a Wikipedia policy on "contentious information" to justify your numerous reversions of edits that reported Lee Mroszak’s death? In fact, there was NOTHING "contentious" about reporting Lee's death. He died on the weekend. When I edited the article on the subsequent Monday morning, there was no published obituary, and the only “sources” were social media posts by friends. I am "bringing this up now" because this was my first visit to Wikipedia since my edit, and I noticed your repeated reversions. It may surprise you to learn that many editors do not spend hours on Wikipedia each day with the goal of battling other editors and reverting as many edits as possible. Again, if you believe a citation is needed on an article, please assume good faith and use the citation needed tag instead of reverting accurate information. Thank you. MiamiManny (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is contentious to claim that someone has died without a reliable source. Don't do that again. Meters (talk) 04:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you had read the linked policy you would have seen "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Meters (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MiamiManny:, Meters is correct. Any death claim needs to come with a source. Adding a citation needed tag would be inappropriate. Quoting WP:Verify: "In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it."

there was no published obituary, and the only “sources” were social media posts by friends. If that happens, we have to be patient and wait for an obituary. I realise that can be frustrating but Wikipedia's sourcing policies are strict, especially for Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]