Talk:Lee Mead

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Musical Theatre

Lee Mead is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concert for Diana

Very well written, but there was far too much detail about the concert's television audience, which is irrelevant to this article. If one would want to see more details, click on the link to the concert. It's the beauty of wikification. Eagle Owl 14:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

This should not be a page for self promotion - there are enough fan sites for that - this is an encylopedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.117.185 (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to be pedantic but there are too many reviews on this page. When reviews were added to Will Young's page it was deemed inappropriate!Oyster24 05:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Josephsandgraham.jpg

Image:Josephsandgraham.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Lee

Fans are willing to donate their pictures to this site. How would that fit into the Wiki Rules? (RandomlyDreaming 04:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Unsigned IP comment

For an encyclopedia this is a very badly written article, but perfect I am sure for Lee Mead's fan websites. This article needs to cleaned up and made appropriate for this site. February 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.117.185 (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked section - inappropriate gossip

Inappropriate gossip and vindictive statements were made in this section. There is no place for it on a wikipedia page.

Deleting sections

Sections are being deleted which are accurate and up to date.

Comments about what 'should' be on the page should be on this discussion page rather than on the article itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verity11 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Mead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090514084444/http://www.threepipe.co.uk/work-vodafone.htm to http://www.threepipe.co.uk/work-vodafone.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lee Mead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Weakest Link

Appeared on Weakest Link Dec 2022. Percy2345 (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]