Talk:Lee Jun-ho/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Lee Jun-ho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Junho created as a redirect, though. Jenks24 (talk) 08:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Lee Junho → Junho – Per WP:STAGENAME, article titles should use the most common name given to the person by mainstream, reliable media sources. Junho is known almost universally by his given name. There is no confusion over who Junho is because Junho is empty (the page located at Junho was previously deleted but that's beside the point). The given name is more straightforward and to the point, and actually more accurate as to how media, JYPE (his management company and promoter), and his rabid fanbase refer to him. Also note that "Lee Junho" receives fewer than 300k hits on Google, while Junho receives over 90 million. Yes, quite a few of the hits for Junho are for other people, but if any of those other people get their own articles, a disambiguation page is all that's necessary (and Lee Junho would still be the most notable). Does anyone have thoughts on this? Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 04:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC) CaseyPenk (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:STAGENAME is not applied here since the proposed name is just a short form of his name. Moreover, most of Korean singers, actors on Wikipedia are credited in their full name (except for those whose stage names are different from the original). I think WP:NCP is relevant here so don't need renaming--Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose, per WP:NCP: don't use a given name (even if unambiguous) for an article title if the family name is known and fairly often used. Also note that while no other article may exist at Junho, various articles exist on persons given the audibly indistinguishable names Jun-Ho and Joon-Ho. ENeville (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lee Jun-ho (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140328173809/http://www.tenasia.com/2pm-junho-impresses-with-big-screen-debut-thriller/ to http://www.tenasia.com/2pm-junho-impresses-with-big-screen-debut-thriller/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Concerns
hi paper9oll. Why remove Junho's wins for AAA? It happened yesterday. I hope you bring back that again if the problem is only source. And also, why claim everyone has right to provide input when all you have to do is to delete it?? Namu Wiki is more reliable now than wiki page. If you inputted it on the actual day like what you did on Baeksang, then this issue could've escalated. So disappointed. Info with reliable evidence to be deleted. BTW, I'm a real person FYI Cindz1864 (talk) 07:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Cindz1864 Which part of WP:POLICIES is uncleared??? Which part of "
No reliable source
" is uncleared. Since Namuwiki is "more reliable
" then go there and edit instead since you can't even follow the WP:GUIDELINES and WP:POLICIES other than complaining here and there instead of bothering to read up in which, if you have trouble in doing so then as per WP:CIR, you shouldn't be editing here. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Added info
I request of you to add in listicles. Lee Junho is included in the list and he's top 11 tied with Cha Eun Woo. And also add FunDex Awards grand prize actor, it is valid and I have even sent formal email on that. I hope for your kind consideration. I think it's better that you add that since you know wiki page better than us.I hope also that you won't play favoritism. Thank you. Cindz1864 (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done Please provide secondary independent reliable sources showing that the listicles and/or awards ceremony is a notable event with significant coverage, and not a routine coverage as per WP:BURDEN. Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion as per WP:ONUS, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey what's with that angry tone? I requested you nicely if you can observe on my tone as I was editing. It looks like your having a bad hair day. I know some rules in Wiki page.I even provided source. Sorry if I ruin your mood, so next time you make all the added info since you know more than the one who is helping improve the page. Thanks. 112.211.3.103 (talk) 08:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Whats up WP:LOGOUT sock. You clearly can't follow the Wikipedia's WP:GUIDELINES and WP:POLICIES by logging in and out to edit, now it makes me wonder if this is the only account that you're operating as your behaviour and initial wording suggested that you're WP:TAGTEAM and/or operating WP:MEATPUPPET. In addition, you also failed to understand English properly by replying in the wrong section despite not even relevant to the initial topic nor the reply. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey what's with that angry tone? I requested you nicely if you can observe on my tone as I was editing. It looks like your having a bad hair day. I know some rules in Wiki page.I even provided source. Sorry if I ruin your mood, so next time you make all the added info since you know more than the one who is helping improve the page. Thanks. 112.211.3.103 (talk) 08:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans 07:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
– Revert 2016 move as clear primary topic by overwhelming pageviews (99.5%). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support: as per nom. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)