Talk:Lee Jae-yoon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Canada: Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Jae-yoon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130629135536/http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2972185 to http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2972185

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Jae-yoon

Moved this discussion here:

Hi there, please stop mixing up my edits into your version everyone has the right to edit including me, Also do not link Canada per overlinking guidelines. I have fix categories in alphabetical order and making good edits for my version carefully. If you could do not restore your edits into your version, I am making good edits very carefully. I am just telling you what not to revert to your version. OK? Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:34C3:F496:71FB:7EC3 (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then mark your edits correctly, as they are not minor edits; specify your reasons for each non-minor edit, why it is necessary. We operate in reason and logic. All edits are valid if they are reasonable, otherwise, edit revert is the option.

Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained twice in the edit summary at Jae Yoon Lee's article. 2001:569:7C07:2600:34C3:F496:71FB:7EC3 (talk) 08:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have left your other edits with blank descriptions, and they are not minor. In the future, refrain from leaving blank descriptions on non-minor edits. Or tag them as minor, if they really are minor, if you think they don't require an explanation. Otherwise, please observe proper editing practices.

Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 08:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disrespectful Dispute Resolution Activity

Moving this here, because you, 2001:569:7C07:2600:34C3:F496:71FB:7EC3 went to a user's talk page (Jjj1238's) instead of resolving it with me, Migsmigss, directly and amicably:

Help me, User:MigsMigss have accuse me of vandalism for the Jae-yoon Lee article. User: MigsMigss have restored Category:Canadian Male actors and Category:South Korean Male actors because they are both container categories and Container categories cannot be used for articles only subcategories. I did explain my edit and User:MigsMigss have restored them and my explanation is invalid. The user has warned me for a possible block. I know I am not making vandalism nor my disruptive edits. So could go to article titled Jae-yoon Lee and restore my edit to my version and talk to User:MigsMigss to please do not use Category:Canadian Male actors and Category:South Korean Male actors because they are both container categories but not for articles. Talk to User:MigsMigss for more details on container categories. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:34C3:F496:71FB:7EC3 (talk) 08:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This has been resolved. The edits are there. Please provide description for your non-minor edits, or tag them as minor if you think they are minor. You have also made changes to my talk page [here] and reverted my edits on my own talk page [here], when I already told you that I have moved our discussion, more aptly, to the Lee Jae-yoon talk page [here].

Your edits are welcome but please observe propriety and respectful practices in contributing. You have also asked for this user's help, but can't reply amiably to our discussion? What is it that you want to achieve? I have responded to you in a well-meaning manner and have understood your points, but continue with these unnecessary actions, like not resolving the issue directly with me and instead resorting to discussing it on another user's talk page, and I will deem it unacceptable and an attack on my right as contributor and editor. Discuss and resolve things with me properly, as the editorial issue is between us. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 09:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bri, I'm sorry to disturb you but could you please help mediate? I have tried resolving this issue with this user/IP address, but he/she has moved the discussion, inappropriately, to Jjj1238's page [here], without resolving it with me directly. As I've said above, this user has also made changes to my talk page [here] and reverted my edits on my own talk page [here], when I already told him/her that I have moved our discussion, more aptly, to the Lee Jae-yoon talk page [here].

It has moved the discussion to another user's page, but can't reply amiably to our discussion? What is it that he really wants to achieve, I wonder? I have responded to him/her in in a well-meaning manner and have understood his/her points, but dragging our unresolved discussion to another's talk page without resolving it with me directly? It is disrespectful and unacceptable.

Please advise what we could with this.

Thank you so much, and my apologies for the bother.

Migsmigss (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, as I've looked into this, users [23.16.167.50] and [2001:569:7c07:2600:34c3:f496:71fb:7ec3] as shown on the article's [Edit history] may likely be one and the same, as they have both responded to my edit queries, like one single person? Should we look into this as possible sock puppetry? I am quite unsure how to proceed.

I hope you could help. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]