Jump to content

Talk:Leathermouth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Screamo

[edit]

After hearing this bands material, I believe (and this is mostly opinion but go compare some other bands yourself) this band could be considered screamo, or atleast hardcore punk. And I don't mean Alesana/BMTH/Scene-kid-with-skinny-jeans screamo, but honest to G-d screamo, the punk sub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.230.14 (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hardcore

[edit]

this band is hardcore completly hardcore.......my chemical romance its post hardcore but L/M isnt post hardcore —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanTorresROCKS (talkcontribs) 21:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is your own opinion and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, only what can be verified through reliable sources. Post-hardcore can be verified, although the sources provided are questionable and should be updated. Myspace does not meet Wikipedia's criteria as a source because (a) it's not published (b) a first party source directly related to subject in question. Fezmar9 (talk) 22:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This excuse of band has never played pure hardcore, find reliable sources next time. --Kmaster (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok but i leave you here the mtv page [1] here it says that its hardcore PD I SAW YOUR USER PAGE , VERY GOOD IM ALSO TIRED OF REGGAETON AND I ALSO TALK SPANISH —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanTorresROCKS (talkcontribs) 02:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That MTV page copied and pasted the bio from Allmusic, who categorizes the band as post-hardcore and alternative/indie rock. Fezmar9 (talk) 02:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second studio album?

[edit]

Many of the recent edits to this article, aside from changing the genre, have been regarding a new album from the band. If a reliable source could be provided for this information, this would make a good addition to the article. I could not find anything after checking Google News, Myspace blogs and the official website. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and until a source can be provided, this speculation should not be included on the article. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leathermouth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]