Talk:Learned optimism
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Pointless photos
[edit]What is the point of the generic photos? Delete them. Put the title-comments in the body of the text if need be. 92.28.250.77 (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Valid Article?
[edit]While it would appear that the article is about a noteworthy subject, it is based almost entirely on a book that it is more or less about. Rather than explaining what the theory meant to its originator, it should be concerned with practise. 93.96.148.42 (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Criticism not relevant
[edit]While it's true that Seligman's ideas have been used by the armed forces, the article cited in this section doesn't mention Seligman, and its lone reference to "resilience" is connected only very tenuously to Seligman's work with soldiers. The article is much more about the way in which trauma and its history are neglected in the psychiatric treatment of soldiers. I would drop this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slane00 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)