Talk:Leapfrogging/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Leapfrogging. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
bad link?
the link to 'solar age' redirects to 'astrological age', which doesn't seem to be correct in this context Vancomycin (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed too. I think this should link to a page like that.Kromsson (talk) 12:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Polluting tecnology
I think I'd be "neutrality-friendly" to describe some of the problems or critics this theory has. One big example would be in the field of "polluting tecnology". In this particualr case history has (and is) proving that less efficient tecnology is beeing pushed into developing countries by first-world corporations banned to use them in their home countries. There are lots of examples, a really flagrant one is Botnia, who has installed a polluting paper factory in Uruguay, which doesn't come near to fullfilling pollution regulations in Finland, the company's home country.
Statistics for the mobile web
Maybe this data ist useful enough to be included/linked to: http://www.opera.com/smw/2009/01/ --84.138.221.61 (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)