Talk:Leap year problem

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Leap year#Algorithm|Leap Year Algorithm]] The anchor (#Algorithm) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Categorization

I would disagree with this being in the software-stub category - not entirely sure where to sort it to but it's not software, more a stub related to software. A possibility would be creating a software bugs stub category but I find the prospect rather useless and unappealing - it's far too specific and would thus be empty (rather nice for a stub category I suppose). Whereabouts would you place this? KieranTribe (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content

The original content discussing the OOXML Standard referred to p.3305 in Section 3.17.41 (which I believe was actually 3.17.4.1). I've seen other references to this page in articles that were dated 2006 - when the Standard was published. It makes me believe a preliminary document existed but is no longer available from ECMA.

As of 2016, there are five editions of the Standard on the ECMA website. The first was published in 2006; the last four were published jointly with the ISO/IEC (Publication 29500) beginning in 2008. None of them discuss the leap-year bug on p.3305.

In any case, I replaced the "citation needed" with a link to the Standards available today. Pbyhistorian (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision / Expansion

I've been working on expanding knowledge of leap year bugs for awhile now, so I decided to improve this article. Please let me know if you feel anything needs additional work. I have much more I could add, but this seemed like a good start. Thanks.--mj1856 (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]