Talk:League of Legends/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 12:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have to give this article a quick fail. The lead is too short, the development is almost completly unreferenced, and most of the article is about the gameplay.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Some sections should be written as prose and it does not follow the Manual of Style

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No references in the "Development" section, recognised as "OR"

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Fix development, as stated above.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   Seems pretty good.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Other than the boxart, there is nothing. No image of the developers, maybe a screenshot...nothing.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   As you can see, this article will need A LOT of work before it can pass. Good luck! --Khanassassin (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Things to do

• The lead - The lead should contain a little of everything. The gameplay, story, development, release, reception...
• Gameplay - The section should be a bit shortened, since most of the article is about the gameplay. I also spoted a "" in there.
• Story - A section dedicated to the story, if the game has one.
• Development and Distribution - The development section really needs lots of references, and a few could be added the Distribution section
• Reception - The award table should probably be converted to prose