Talk:League for the Fifth International

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for League for the Fifth International (8 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	1,637	1,637
History	596	596
Publications	655	655
Member organisations	1,641	3,706
Groups that share a common history with L5I	2,065	2,065
See also	91	91
References	33	33
External links	205	205
Total	6,923	6,923

Fair use rationale for Image:L5I-DR.png

Image:L5I-DR.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:L5I-LOGO-WORDS-RED.PNG

Image:L5I-LOGO-WORDS-RED.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Mess

This article is a mess. It is grossly POV and poorly sourced. This article needs a heavy makeover. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Workers' Power, not Pouvoir Ouvrier

The UK group is Trotskyist. The French group was the councilist, pro-Marx split from SouB. I have therefore removed Pouvoir Ouvrier from the list.

Workers Power United States

The link to the Workers Power US article is incorrect and leads to a previous organisation with the same name but no other connection, the current organisation was formed circa ten years ago — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9C84:9100:A119:23B1:9D70:2AE0 (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]