Talk:League for Social Reconstruction

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lack of Publications

The article is rather light on publications. This seems strange as the impact of the LSR on Canadian social democracy is directly connected to ideas laid out in its main works. I'm considering laying out the table on contents to each book or perhaps creating separate articles for them, namely Social Planning for Canada and Democracy Needs Socialism with brief descriptions.Jkerr208 (talk) 19:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of article

I'm flagging this article as biased and also marking the summary for needed citations. It puts an inordinate amount of credit on the LSR for the recovery from the depression without any consideration for other factors or policies. It also reads very much like socialist propaganda without sufficient room for evaluation. As an example:

For the LSR, the Depression was the inexorable result of laissez-faire philosophy. This philosophy had spread since the Act of Union in 1840, which began a transition from power structures that favoured aristocracy to structures that favoured business. Responsible government arrived shortly after the union, and shifted influence from the governor to ministers. Powers that had previously been focused in the governor, became divided among ministers. No meaningful administrative structures were implemented to ensure that ministers remained responsive to the public, and ministers aligned themselves with capitalists.

Neoluddite7 (talk) 17:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of problems with this article. I only fixed some citation issues as, if I remember correctly, it essentially didn't have any. Haven't really looked at the structure, but I think that may also be not great. Some of the citation issues in the lead section can be addressed by citations in the body of the article. Other issues require a rewrite. I don't have the time to fix this article until at least March, working on other articles in the meantime. Sad to see such an important Canadian intellectual movement having this mediocre article representing them.--Abebenjoe (talk) 07:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on League for Social Reconstruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040811230528/http://www.canadahistory.com/sections/documents/1932_manifesto_-_league_for_social_reform.htm to http://www.canadahistory.com/sections/documents/1932_manifesto_-_league_for_social_reform.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]