Talk:Lead and Copper Rule
 | A fact from Lead and Copper Rule appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Lead
[edit]The lead section is too long, it shouldn't contain any info not found in the body of the text per WP:LEAD. Use the intro to basically summarize the article's content. I am sure this can be easily addressed by the main author here with some text moving a quick introduction rewrite. This is the reason I tagged the article. IvoShandor 09:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Looks okay, the lead is probably still a bit long, maybe just one paragraph needed for an article this size but it's much better. :-) IvoShandor 12:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- I moved the second paragraph over to one of the sections, seeing as it was able to be done. (By the way, beautiful job on the copyedit). MessedRocker (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like that was Andplus, nice work on the lead and restructuring, and the article, btw. IvoShandor 14:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I moved the second paragraph over to one of the sections, seeing as it was able to be done. (By the way, beautiful job on the copyedit). MessedRocker (talk) 19:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Ugh
[edit]Adoption isn't about adoption. Criticism isn't about the Lead and Copper Rule, but enforcement of it. The description of the rule (in Adoption) is incomplete and inaccurate. And Background probably shouldn't be quoting 1993 articles for a rule that was conceived in the 1986 SDWA amendments and initially implemented in 1991. Leef (talk) 03:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
My yard is turning green ..the color of oxidized copper ... I have animals... and i drink tap water ..is this safe ?? How can I get this tested ??? Julue (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lead and Copper Rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100227023232/http://www.epa.gov:80/OGWDW/lcrmr/lead_review.html to http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/lcrmr/lead_review.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)