Talk:Le prophète

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Requested move 23 November 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Le prophète (opera) → Le prophète – a) There is no other work with this name, so the disambiguator is unnecessary. b) The execution of User:Wisdood's undiscussed move was flawed: no incoming links were adjusted, and the entry for the opera at the disambiguation she/he created at Le Prophète redirected to itself, the DAB page (now corrected). c) Disambiguation for the related general term "prophet" is already properly located via various redirects at Prophet (disambiguation). Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Michael Bednarek. Should never have been moved in the first place without discussion anyway.--Smerus (talk) 06:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support, felt the same as you two, but was too tired to begin this. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Michael Bednarek. One of the rare cases where there really is a clear primary topic on both criteria. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Michael Bednarek and the other editors above.Smeat75 (talk) 18:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. No controversy here. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 00:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.