Talk:Le Puy-en-Velay

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject French communes, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Distracting blank spaces

Formatting that encases the framed table of contents in text, in just the way a framed map or image is enclosed within the text, is now available: {{TOCleft}} in the HTML does the job.

Blank space opposite the ToC, besides being unsightly and distracting, suggests that there is a major break in the continuity of the text, which may not be the case. Blanks in page layout are voids and they have meanings to the experienced reader. The space betweeen paragraphs marks a brief pause between separate blocks of thought. A deeper space, in a well-printed text, signifies a more complete shift in thought: note the spaces that separate sub-headings in Wikipedia articles.

A handful of thoughtless and aggressive Wikipedians revert the "TOCleft" format at will. A particularly aggressive de-formatter is User:Ed g2s

The reader may want to compare:

--Wetman 19:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Missing word(s)

There is a word or phrase missing from the second paragraph of the architecture section: "The striking parti-colored [missing word] is connected to ..." Athænara ✉ 17:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tempest Anderson images

Hi all, PatHadley here. I'm the Wikipedian-in-Residence at York Museums Trust (project pages). We're just getting started with a major upload of lantern slides by Tempest Anderson, a pioneering vulcanologist based in York. The image category is here: Category:Images from the Tempest Anderson Collection. It needs a little tidying but already has some great images of Le-Puy-en-Velay and the surrounding areas. They were taken on a trip around 1885. There will be more than 300 images coming soon (hopefully at higher resolutions!). If you have any questions please let me know. I hope you find them useful! Cheers, PatHadley (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tonbridge

@Bmclaughlin9: - re your removal of the {{Tonbridge}} template with the comment "not relevant here" - I contend that as the twin town of Tonbridge, the template is relevant here. It's been on this article a long time now without previous challenge. Surely that shows that it is relevant? If there was a Le Puy template, I'd expect it to be on the Tonbridge article. Please reconsider your removal. Mjroots (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That it may have been here a long time is not a valid argument. Sister cities are themselves a minor point and including this much in reference to a sister city is completely out of proportion to Tonbridge's relevance to Le-Puy-en-Velay. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Le Puy-en-Velay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Lu/lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lu/lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#Lu/lə ˈpœj də ˈvəlaj until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]