Talk:Lawfare/Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Lawfare. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Corporate lawfare?
Does this article need a new section for corporate lawfare? It seems to be wholly exempt from the article.
Related / subordinate to this is the "patent war".
--Fixuture (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- What do reliable sources say about "corporate lawfare", if anything? bobrayner (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't need to have its own section or even be called corporate warfare. My point is just that lawfare doesn't seem to just apply to nation-states etc. And if it can't get included in the article, "patent war" probably could be linked in the see also section. --Fixuture (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Article is a mess
The article is a battleground of POVs struggling over a fuzzy, muddy concept. It appears to be a babbling meeting of 6 to 10 precocious wonky blogger pundits from all over the political spectrum, each one more sure of himself than the next and used to impressing his friends, dates and interviewers. It's a multi-way personal essay by a disparate committee.
What a mess!!