Talk:Law of Due Obedience

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Law of Due Obedience, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Law of Due Obedience. I think this addresses the concerns in the discussion and eliminates the need for a hyphen in addition to having support on its own. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ley de Obediencia Debida → Due obedience law – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Name in English. I know that there may be other "Due obedience laws" elsewhere, but so far this is the only one with an article, so a DAB entry should be unneeded (at least for the moment). See here to confirm that this is the use in English books, and not "Law of due obedience". There are a pair of entries about other places, but most of them are about this one, the law from Argentina Cambalachero (talk) 03:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – pretty much all the sources use some device to attach "due" to "obedience", to prevent the wrong default reading; whether it be the normal English hyphenation due-obedience law or quotation marks "due obedience" law, or caps Due Obedience law. I recommend the hyphen. Dicklyon (talk) 07:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The title of a legislative act is capitalized. Otherwise it looks like the name of a field of common law, like "due diligence law". —Tamfang (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, after fixing caps., if the only objection is WP:CAPS then fix caps. This should be in English. No reason to niggle. But per Winning Small Battles, Losing the War p49 Marieke Denissen - 2009 "The last straw was the Falklands War, which lasted for three months in 1982 and ended in Argentina's humiliating defeat. ... The Law of Due Obedience established that charges against lower-ranking officers would be dropped. " this would be better. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename -- This is the English WP, so that article titles should be in English. Whether the target should be Due Obedience Law or Law of Due Obedience does not concern me too much. The resultatn redirect should be retained. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law of Due Obedience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515222256/http://www.nuncamas.org/document/nacional/ley23521.htm to http://www.nuncamas.org/document/nacional/ley23521.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]