Jump to content

Talk:Lauri Kristian Relander

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lauri Kristian Relander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism and neutral point of view

[edit]

Is it just me or is this a really biased article? It seems almost as if it is an attack page because of the constant references to how seemingly bad Relander was as a president. I don't know anything about him other than that he was in the Handshake article so maybe he was "widely regarded" to be a bad president but it seems like those remarks should be confined into a Criticism section rather than all over the article. The other sections should be purely biographical. Here are some examples:

  • "Opinion leaders could not take him seriously" is stated as fact and
  • "Relander can not be considered a strong President" is an opinion and not helpful to the article.
  • "Kallio did not talk straight to him and schemed behind [Relander's] back" is really informal language and it seems like there should be some sort of an [x] described their relationship with Kallio as etc.
  • That he had "not enough common sense" is an opinion and stated as fact.

I would be bold and redo this whole article (or add a template) but in the meantime I was wondering if I could get some sort of consensus if we should put up an Unbalanced template or something of the sort. --- Mullafacation {talk page|user page} 17:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]