Talk:Laurent Eketebi

Laurent Eketebi has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 1, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Africa: DRC

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo.
	This article was created or improved during the "African 10,000 Challenge", which started in 1 September 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laurent Eketebi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Punctuation needs work - lots of missing commas, but this is not part of the criteria
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Well references with several books and other sources. Copyvio detector showed up nothing
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Whilst the article doesn’t cover everything in detail, it covers the main aspects and is continually focused on the subject
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Lacking important images but not a reason to fail
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Needs a little bit of work with punctuation, but good in quality and well referenced. Well done

Image

I think this photograph was published in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and hence would be in the public domain. Am I correct?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Petit Chat: I’m inclined to agree, but I know only the basics regarding copyright. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]