Talk:Latex clothing

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Polymers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illustration

I have added the current picture. I tried to put the least provocative picture I could find (this one is from a store catalogue), and felt it was important to have a picture of a garnment made entirely of latex, and not of something that only use a small bit of it. This approach seems a good one to me. Of course the picture could be better (and free), and another type of garnment may be better. I tried to find a 100% latex garnment with no sexual connotations but I don't know if that even exists! Tonigonenstein 00:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this page turned into a Bianca Beauchamp shrine? I mean, she's hot and all, but we should try to be a little more encyclopedic. Titan24 22:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. i dont think 6 pictures of her are necessary to understand latex clothing. especially of her modelling her breasts. Aznfurball 04:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted illustration

I reverted the illustration from Image:Bianca catsuit.jpg to Image:Latex_catsuit_female.jpg. Before anybody has a fit over this, it isn't intended to be an act of censorship (I'm a member of Wikipedians Against Censorship); the current image illustrates the topic better (providing a full-body shot of a latex suit), while the nudity in the former illustration actually distracted from the subject. Jeff Silvers 21:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To better illustrate my point, here's a quote from WP:IUP:

Images should depict their content well (the object of the image should be clear and central).

The woman's breasts took up the majority of the previous image (and even if they hadn't, they still distract unnecessarily from the supposed object of the image, the latex suit). Jeff Silvers 21:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latex Thickness

There is *no* way that most clothing is 2 mm thick. 0.5 mm is much more common, skin tight 2 mm would be incredibly restrictive. While I have unfortunately no citation to prove my point, making this original research (ahem), I think the topic is obscure enough that we can stretch (ha!) the rules a little Observer31 22:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splinter cell: latex??

The article references the main character of splinter cell and his particular outfit. I know for a fact that the outfit is supposed to be a type of wetsuit, which would be made out of neoprene, a synthetic rubber. Does that fit into the category of latex? I wouldn't have thought it did. cyclosarin (talk) 11:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By convention and ignorance, people tend to refer to any rubbery clothing as latex clothing. In truth, real natural latex is used in less and less latex clothing every year. Still, I have no problem including such things in this article because I'd rather that, than having an article called elastic clothing, which just comes off as contrived. I'd love to have a citation that explains that not all rubbery clothing is really latex, but I'm probably too lazy to seek it out. -Verdatum (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

latex manufacturers and producers

It would be nice to include some of these references. If there is no objection I will try to provide some. The problem will be with the producers of the raw material. I don't have a clue what to cite here. I heard there is a company in Malaysia but don't know its name though. NakedCousin (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sheet versus Liquid

There was some misinformation on the page that stated sheet latex and liquid latex are the exact same thing and clothing made from either is exactly the same. This is not true, as sheet latex is pre-Vulcanized in order to cure it and liquid latex cures via air drying. While there can be little difference in the final product in the hands of a skilled latex craftsman, to say there is no difference is incorrect. I've cited sources for this: http://www.bellaonline.com/ArticlesP/art52064.asp http://books.google.com/books?id=V98YjsZsJ8IC&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=how+is+%22sheet+latex%22+made+vulcanization&source=bl&ots=8em8V5rqlC&sig=v59T5ZzW6RtyWJrWOGM9AkHeNbY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xY_ZUO3pNYr9qQHkmID4Cw&ved=0CG8Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=how%20is%20%22sheet%20latex%22%20made%20vulcanization&f=false

Also, whoever said that 2mm isn't the most common thickness would be correct. It ranges, but anything above 0.65mm is considered very thick (as can be seen from an ordering website here : http://elasticaengineering.com/zencart/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=15 ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killpurakat (talk • contribs) 22:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]