This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Retitle to Background and composition, moving the comp here
To avoid having very very very small sections, I created "Background and composition". On many instances, the "Background" section also encompasses info on the song's release process, so I think this should be fine. Also I prefer this to "Release and reception", since IMO, those don't have anything in common. I hope this is alright.
[5] should be solely at the end of the sentence
"he addressed this matter" → "he addressed this discussion"
"pointing out that at the time of the article's release in September 2018, there" → "pointing out in September 2018 there"
Should German Airplay really be included when the main one is already there?
It's a split ranking, focusing on airplay only (I don't even think those are counted into the official ranking). The source is trustworthy and the chart has gained a reputation, I think this should be included.
Maybe change 25 May 2018 release to various and merge those citations into one ref?
I usually do this when a song is released on the same date in many, many, maybe almost all countries. In this case, it is only 6 countries, and I think the reader should be aware of this.
Why are refs 8 and 16 cited as iTunes Store when the rest cite Apple Music? Also, numerous Apple citations are missing the language parameter when they are in foreign ones that opt to translate upon opening.
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 19 and 29, also what exactly makes this a reliable source?
You are right, I'm not 100% sure. It is a popular radio station in Greece. I removed the 150 million streams claim, but I think the info about the awards show can remain since it is noncontroversial information.
Refs 40, 41, 42 and 44 are not consistent with the archive date formatting