Talk:Last Letters from Stalingrad

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Military history: European / German / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Circular reference removed.

Not sure how such things come to be allowed, but the following reference regarding the Beyer study and its objections is to a blog, that presents excerpts of the English and German "last Letters…" wikipedia articles (the only mention of Beyer). We are therefore citing a blog citing ourselves (this article). Here is the removed reference:

"El Polo Real". Retrieved 2012-12-20.

Not encyclopedic, and of no value leaving in here as a source—and in fact detrimental, because in appearing as a sourced statement, readers approach the work unquestioning, and editors as if that statement's editing is finished, needing no further attention. Le Prof 71.201.62.200 (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]