Talk:Laser Inc

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Of course it is important. Laser Inc is one of the most wellknown band in sweden right now. Vandalism Sucks! 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Please, be careful with your words: This was not vandalism, this was a normal Wiki action towards a speedy deletion candidate. See WP:MUSIC: Notability for bands to see why Laser inc does not assert notability. If it does, please indicate it on the article with reliable references. Victao lopes (talk) 23:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy request, as the band has indeed charted in both Sweden and Finland, fulfilling a key part of WP:MUSIC. I'll try to find more about the band and provide a couple more sources, and give it a quick rewrite. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was not stated at the article when I first read it, that's why I requested its deletin. Now that the notaility is asserted, I'll try to expand the article a little. Victao lopes (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laser Inc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121230113932/http://www.getmusic.com.au/store/artist/music/detail.aspx?pid=90591&aid=70878 to http://www.getmusic.com.au/store/artist/music/detail.aspx?pid=90591&aid=70878

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]