Talk:Lars and the Real Girl

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Headlines

Ryan Gosling Ain't No Dummy! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mahohla Dargis

Why is her opinion being given so much weight? I don't deny that she's an "important" film critic, but her opinion basically gets an entire paragraph.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.147.138 (talk • contribs) 06:47, October 20, 2007

When I added quotes by various critics, I thought I was giving her the same weight as the others. It looks like the section has been edited now, but I felt that full quotes would be best because I didn't quite know how to paraphrase what she said. --Pixelface (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

synopsis

Where is the synopsis? Topio

I'm working on it right now, but it might take a couple days to get it completed. Further, I don't intend to do anything beyond putting down the text, so someone else will need to add any links or whatever. 136.168.200.1 (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I finished the plot. Feel free to review it for any mistakes, as I only saw the movie once and some details are fading. 75.80.82.112 (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the synopsis is great. I changed the bit about Lars living in a room "next to the garage" to "in a converted garage". Because I watched carefuly and his bedroom is in the first bay of the garage to the left of the big window.

What is missing is What is wrong with Lars? and Why does he get better? His mother died when he was born, his father was distant, and his older brother left home as soon as possible. Lars was afraid of intimacy because everyone important to him abandoned him. Bianca's social life and the doctor's therapy helped him realize that he could trust people to be there for him. I just don't know how to work that into the synopsis. Sheherazahde (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity Today

The Christian article no longer works, but here is an alternative address:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/movies/reviews/2007/larsandtherealgirl.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.140.242 (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biased?

There seems to be absolutely no negative comments about the movie, no criticisms, and certainly nothing in the Reception section. I find it hard to believe that any movie is made without some form of feedback like that. The lack of any harsh comments or reviews being referenced in the article makes it feel rather biased.--68.6.182.39 (talk) 04:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RT 81%, MC 70% that is fairly positive, so while there were some negative reviews anyone that wanted to mention them would need to be careful not to give them undue emphasis. Sure there were some negative reviews too, like the one from the Chicago Tribune but even that still strongly praised the cast.[1] -- 109.78.193.127 (talk) 18:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lars and the Real Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100406000000/http://www.humanitasprize.org/Prize_PastWinners.html to http://www.humanitasprize.org/Prize_PastWinners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]