Talk:Larks' Tongues in Aspic (instrumental)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Crimson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Crimson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King CrimsonWikipedia:WikiProject King CrimsonTemplate:WikiProject King CrimsonKing Crimson articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Progressive Rock High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm a King Crimson fan but also a Wikipedian and this needs major cleanup. If anyone wants to start a King Crimson WikiProject, I'll definitely be participating.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 21:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and it's not technically a song because it doesn't have singing. It's a composition. This article should be renamed as such.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first of all it's kind of fan-boyish to have a separate "impact in fan circles" section for each part of LTiA. But beyond that, I'm under the impression that KC's re-use of the title is more of a running joke than a serious attempt to treat the four pieces as parts of a greater whole. Does anyone actually listen to them back to back? And what's this recurring musical motif that people speak of... I don't hear any common motif between the parts. They should probably be treated as separate pieces, with a page for each part. 74.65.6.62 02:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a common motif between parts II and III. You just need to listen more closely :) --h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 12:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I'm fairly certain that the intro of part III is derived from part I and/or NY3; if memory serves me well that would be an "and". --Helioshockwave 00:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the greatest problem with this article is that it uses several weasel words that are intended to drive the article, but nothing is verified. 74.106.141.233 02:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what is with these 'Impact on Fan Circles' sections, they obviously reflect only the opinion of the author.Jimmyupt 19:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuelle

Regarding Emmanuelle, a potentially better source can be found here. It's an old forum post that contains a transcription of a magazine article from 1979. The problem is attribution; the forum (presumably at etree.org) is long dead and there are no archives outside of archive.org, and the transcription might be nonsense. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

I'm curious as to why "Larks' Tongues in Aspic" redirects to this page, instead of the page for the album. Shouldn't we assume more people are looking for the album that the song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.241.20.116 (talk) 22:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Larks tongues in aspic album cover.jpg

The image Image:Larks tongues in aspic album cover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the song was ever released by itself, and if it was, it did not use this image as its cover. If I am right, the image needs to be removed. -Freekee (talk) 16:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LTIA Part 2 - Discipline tour

LTIA Part 2 WAS played by the Discipline 4-piece on tour. It was performed at Poole along with (as usual) The Talking Drum. For what its worth the encore was "Red". As far as I can remember they were the only pre-Discipline songs / tunes performed at that show - everything else was from Discipline — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olddemdike (talk • contribs) 01:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Larks' Tongues in Aspic (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607150318/http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=5548 to http://www.dgmlive.com/diaries.htm?entry=5548

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]