Talk:Larklight
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anyone know if there are actually going to be sequels, or a movie? This could be added to the bottom of the page. Thank you for your contributions.--Geracudd 21:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, there will be starcross, the sequel to larklight in september. --Darkmast508 4:55, August 20 2007. —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 08:55, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
possible merge
[edit]An article Larklight trilogy has been started, with sections for each of the books. What are the intentions, to merge? That might not be a bad idea DGG (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Actually I don't think the intentions are to merge. Instead they probably just want to have a page on the trilogy in general. I think that merging the pages would be a bad idea. Just keep them as they are as their are a lot of writing on each of them. It's best not to merge. 119.12.76.150 (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Movie addaption
[edit]Is there any more infomation on the Larklight movie? When I searched the web all I could find was stuff like "There will be a Larklight movie to be realeased in 2010 with a budget of $200 million. Has it begun production yet?
(edit) IMDB says it's due to be released in 2013 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perudafourie (talk • contribs) 11:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Improving this article
[edit]I have started to improve this article. I think the infobox and header are OK now. I've tried to make the 3 books consistent. Note that there is also the Larklight trilogy]article to consider later. It may be possible to merge the 3 book articles into that one, but I'm not sure at this point. If we can try to improve each book article, we could consider that at the end. I would suggest that the trilogy could contain a bit more generic info about the whole series, along with a summary of each book and a 'See main article' for each of the 3. But the main problem is the huge bulk of text in 'plot summary'. I suggest this is split up as per WP:BOOK guidelines, as per the following template section. Any work towards this goal would be great. I'm going to paste the relevant part of the template below - we need to fill in the gaps.
Also, does this series not count as steampunk? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perudafourie (talk • contribs) 12:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
'''''~title of novel~''''' is a ~novel genre(s)~ by ~author of novel~. <!-- Expand the lead paragraph above to summarize the article (but NOT the plot, which belongs in the plot introduction section below). Briefly describe distinctive characteristics of the novel, major themes, awards, and notable adaptations. Do not make any statement that is not expanded later in another section of the article. See [[Wikipedia:Lead section]] (WP:LEAD) for guidelines. --> ==Plot introduction== ~Plot introduction~ <!--This should give some idea of the type of novel this article is about, the setting, the period and its place in literature. Consider not giving information that would be thought of as ''spoilers'' unless that is necessary per [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:LEAD]].--> ===Explanation of the novel's title=== ~Explain the novel's title if it's not immediately obvious (e.g., ''[[Things Fall Apart]]'')~ ==Plot summary== ~Plot outline description~ ==Characters in "~title of novel~"== ~Describe and possibly link to characters of novel.~ ==Major themes== ~thematic description, using the work of literary critics (i.e. scholars)~ ==Literary significance and reception== ~description of the work's initial reception and legacy based on the work of literary critics and commentators over the years, give citations~ ==References== or ==Allusions== ~these are not sections for mention of trivial items but verifiable references or allusions to or from other works.~ ===References to other works=== ~description of how this novel mentions other works or their characters~ ===References to actual history, geography and current science=== ~description of how this novel mentions other incidents and subject matter outside the world of literature and criticism~ ===References in other works=== ~description of works that mention this novel or its characters, if applicable~ ==Awards and nominations== ~lists awards the work received, and significant nominations, if applicable~ ==Film, TV or theatrical adaptations== ~references to major film, TV, theatrical, radio, etc. adaptations, if applicable~ ==Publication history== ~*year, country, publisher ISBN 1234567890, Pub date DD Month Year, binding~ <!--major publication history to be included here, not everything if too extensive--> <!--example--> <!--*1999, USA, C.S. Black & sons ISBN 8768768760, Pub date 1 April 1999, Hardback --> ==Sources, references, external links, quotations== ~references to sources etc~ ~include quotes or links to [http://www.wikiquote.org/ Wikiquote] here~ <!--Link to, but don't include, reviews of the novel and other sources--> <!--Links to websites about novel--> [[Category:~year~ novels]] [[Category:~country~ novels]] [[Category:~genre~ novels]] or [[Category:Novels]] ~Stub notice, if necessary~ {{divbox|red|TalkPage Template Notice|Also please move the following template to the Talk page and remove this notice as well as the template boilerplate! - thank you}} '''{{NovelsWikiProject}}'''
-- Chzz ► 03:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Plot Summary Too Long
[edit]The Plot Summary is way too long. Someone might want to read this and give it a rewrite. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_plot_summary Tlqk56 (talk) 02:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Stub-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Stub-Class Science fiction novels articles
- Unknown-importance Science fiction novels articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Low-importance children and young adult literature articles