Talk:Larisa Iordache/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I note there is a previous PR: Wikipedia:Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed?

Regardless, really amazing article - quite well researched, excellent density of citations.

date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB
quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point.

I will address each GA point:

Well written
- prose is clear and understandable. It does not flow as easily as an FA grade article, but I may be able to help with that.
- the structure is excellent, lead section is three paragraphs long which is on the border of the ecessive length, but I think it is acceptable. I see no problematic phrases.
Verifiable and NOR
- I cannot see any original research
- referencing seems excellent
- I am not a domain expert, so it is somewhat hard for me to comment on the quality of the linked news articles. Also, I don’t speak Romanian.
Coverage
- Seems to cover the life of the subject well, good table summary of achievements
- does not diverge from the topic
Neutrality
- the use of quotes potentially needs some contextualising, this is a minor issue and perhaps my own personal bug bear; otherwise it is quite neutral in tone
Stability
- seems fine
Illustrated
- use of images is excellent, well done

Hope this is helpful! Excellent work from the contributor(s). - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aussie Article Writer, thanks for reviewing!

I note there is a previous PR: Wikipedia:Peer review/Larisa Iordache/archive1. Could I ask if all the points were addressed? Y Yes, they were back when the review was done in 2014.
date of birth requires a reliable source, otherwise it is a violation of WP:DOB. Done
quotes should be prefaced by context. So for instance, there is a quote about Câmpeanu-Silişteanu noticing her speed, but to connect this quote we need to state more explicitly to the previous point. Done I added more context to the quotes throughout the article, but if you think it's not enough, let me know

@Riley1012: well done, this os now categorised as a GA. I left you a message in your talk page for a further suggestion, but not one that affects GA status. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]